Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Sex and the Supremacy of Christ, 2004 Desiring God Conference

Sex and the Supremacy of Christ, Part 2
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 26, 2004
John Piper

The Goodness of Sex and the Glory of God
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Ben Patterson

Homosexual "Marriage": A Tragic Oxymoron--Biblical and Cultural Reflections
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Al Mohler

Christian Hedonists or Religious Prudes? The Puritans on Sex
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Mark Dever

Making All Things New: Restoring Pure Joy to the Sexually Broken
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
David Powlison

Speaker Interviews with Mark Dever (Saturday)
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Various

Sex, Romance, and the Glory of God: What Every Christian Husband Needs to Know
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
C.J. Mahaney

Sex, Romance, and the Glory of God: What Every Christian Wife Needs to Know
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Carolyn Mahaney

Sex and the Single Man
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Mark Dever

We're Not on Hold: Biblical Femininity for Single Women
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 25, 2004
Carolyn McCulley

Sex and the Supremacy of Christ, Part 1
2004 Desiring God National Conference
September 24, 2004
John Piper

Prosperity Preaching: Deceitful and Deadly

When I read about prosperity-preaching churches, my response is: “If I were not on the inside of Christianity, I wouldn’t want in.” In other words, if this is the message of Jesus, no thank you.

Luring people to Christ to get rich is both deceitful and deadly. It’s deceitful because when Jesus himself called us, he said things like: “Any one of you who does not renounce all that he has cannot be my disciple” (Luke 14:33). And it’s deadly because the desire to be rich plunges “people into ruin and destruction” (1 Timothy 6:9). So here is my plea to preachers of the gospel.

1. Don’t develop a philosophy of ministry that makes it harder for people to get into heaven.

Jesus said, “How difficult it will be for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom of God!” His disciples were astonished, as many in the “prosperity” movement should be. So Jesus went on to raise their astonishment even higher by saying, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God.” They respond in disbelief: “Then who can be saved?” Jesus says, “With man it is impossible, but not with God. For all things are possible with God” (Mark 10:23-27).

My question for prosperity preachers is: Why would you want to develop a ministry focus that makes it harder for people to enter heaven?

2. Do not develop a philosophy of ministry that kindles suicidal desires in people.

Paul said, “There is great gain in godliness with contentment, for we brought nothing into the world, and we cannot take anything out of the world. But if we have food and clothing, with these we will be content.” But then he warned against the desire to be rich. And by implication, he warned against preachers who stir up the desire to be rich instead of helping people get rid of it. He warned, “Those who desire to be rich fall into temptation, into a snare, into many senseless and harmful desires that plunge people into ruin and destruction. For the love of money is a root of all kinds of evils. It is through this craving that some have wandered away from the faith and pierced themselves with many pangs” (1 Timothy 6:6-10).

So my question for prosperity preachers is: Why would you want to develop a ministry that encourages people to pierce themselves with many pangs and plunge themselves into ruin and destruction?

3. Do not develop a philosophy of ministry that encourages vulnerability to moth and rust.

Jesus warns against the effort to lay up treasures on earth. That is, he tells us to be givers, not keepers. “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal” (Matthew 6:19).

Yes, we all keep something. But given the built-in tendency toward greed in all of us, why would we take the focus off Jesus and turn it upside down?

4. Don’t develop a philosophy of ministry that makes hard work a means of amassing wealth.

Paul said we should not steal. The alternative was hard work with our own hands. But the main purpose was not merely to hoard or even to have. The purpose was “to have to give.” “Let him labor, working with his hands, that he may have to give to him who is in need” (Ephesians 4:28). This is not a justification for being rich in order to give more. It is a call to make more and keep less so you can give more. There is no reason why a person who makes $200,000 should live any differently from the way a person who makes $80,000 lives. Find a wartime lifestyle; cap your expenditures; then give the rest away.

Why would you want to encourage people to think that they should possess wealth in order to be a lavish giver? Why not encourage them to keep their lives more simple and be an even more lavish giver? Would that not add to their generosity a strong testimony that Christ, and not possessions, is their treasure?

5. Don’t develop a philosophy of ministry that promotes less faith in the promises of God to be for us what money can’t be.

The reason the writer to the Hebrews tells us to be content with what we have is that the opposite implies less faith in the promises of God. He says, “Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, ‘I will never leave you nor forsake you.’ So we can confidently say, ‘The Lord is my helper; I will not fear; what can man do to me?’” (Hebrews 13:5-6).

If the Bible tells us that being content with what we have honors the promise of God never to forsake us, why would we want to teach people to want to be rich?

6. Don’t develop a philosophy of ministry that contributes to your people being choked to death.

Jesus warns that the word of God, which is meant to give us life, can be choked off from any effectiveness by riches. He says it is like a seed that grows up among thorns that choke it to death: “They are those who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked by the . . . riches . . . of life, and their fruit does not mature” (Luke 8:14).

Why would we want to encourage people to pursue the very thing that Jesus warns will choke us to death?

7. Don’t develop a philosophy of ministry that takes the seasoning out of the salt and puts the light under a basket.

What is it about Christians that makes them the salt of the earth and the light of the world? It is not wealth. The desire for wealth and the pursuit of wealth tastes and looks just like the world. It does not offer the world anything different from what it already believes in. The great tragedy of prosperity-preaching is that a person does not have to be spiritually awakened in order to embrace it; one needs only to be greedy. Getting rich in the name of Jesus is not the salt of the earth or the light of the world. In this, the world simply sees a reflection of itself. And if it works, they will buy it.

The context of Jesus’ saying shows us what the salt and light are. They are the joyful willingness to suffering for Christ. Here is what Jesus said, “Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you. You are the salt of the earth. . . . You are the light of the world” (Matthew 5:11-14).

What will make the world taste (the salt) and see (the light) of Christ in us is not that we love wealth the same way they do. Rather, it will be the willingness and the ability of Christians to love others through suffering, all the while rejoicing because their reward is in heaven with Jesus. This is inexplicable on human terms. This is supernatural. But to attract people with promises of prosperity is simply natural. It is not the message of Jesus. It is not what he died to achieve.

Treasuring Christ and the Call to Suffer

Here's a recap of John Piper's messages on suffering that he gave over the last few days at Wheaton College:

  • Treasuring Christ and the Call to Suffer, Part 1
    If you are a Christian, it is not a question of whether you will suffer, but when. And natural suffering like disease or disasters can be as much for Christ as persecution is.
  • Part 2
    Whether God is delivering us from suffering or prolonging it, one thing is most important to him—displaying the worth of Christ.
  • Part 3
    God ordains and orders the suffering of the world to show how horrific sin is.
  • Part 4
    How can we have joy amid so much suffering?
  • Q & A
    John Piper answers questions from Wheaton students.

Seven Aims in This Series

Our theme is “Treasuring Christ and the Call to Suffer,” and I have at least seven aims in our time together:

  1. I want to persuade you that your suffering is an essential part of Christian existence. You will suffer (Acts 14:22). And there is kind of suffer that honors Christ and a kind that does not.
  2. I hope to be able to help you suffer in a way that will make Christ look great (2 Cor. 12:9-10).
  3. I hope to help you taste and see that Christ is more precious than everything else in the universe (Ps. 73:24; Phil. 3:8; 1:20; Ps. 63:3).
  4. I want to help you believe that nothing will happen to you apart from God’s will. And in the worst of times, he is 100 percent for you—and not against you—if you are in Christ. Not 99.9 but totally for you (Matt. 10:28-31; Rom. 8:31-32). Everything you need is yours in Christ.
  5. I would like to persuade you that you are in Christ by faith alone apart from any works you do before or after your conversion (Phil. 3:9-10). If being in Christ is the place where everything works for your good, then how you get there really matters. And by works is not how you get there—before or after your conversion.
  6. I want to motivate you and empower you to embrace suffering and hardship and risk and danger for the relief of human suffering, especially eternal suffering, for the glory of Christ. May Wheaton not be one of those ludicrous places where it is thought to be loving to relieve physical suffering for people who are on the road to hell without mention of the gospel. You don’t have to choose between those. Love will embrace the hard-to-reach place and go at life’s peril (Mark 8:34-35).
  7. I am praying that God will use these talks to introduce you into, or confirm you in, the mysterious way of life found in 2 Corinthians 6:10, which we wave as a banner over our church: “Sorrowful yet always rejoicing.”


'America the Ugly' Six years after 9/11, it's notable how little the politics of the left have changed.

Monday, September 10, 2007

U2 in the dark: A Christian view of Achtung Baby (1991) and Zooropa (1993)

GQ ICON: Colin Powell

Off the record with Donald Rumsfeld

The much maligned former secretary of defense talks about his time in office—and insists he has nothing to apologize for


Christ Is My Worth: Self-Esteem, the Feel Good Movement, and the Doctrine of Justification

Could Christianity survive without the gospel? In some quarters, including some fairly close to home, the answer seems to be in the affirmative. We still hear the laity using the lingo from the past, but the theological language of scripture is being increasingly replaced with psychological terminology. Of course, language is not as important as the concepts language conveys, but those concepts themselves are often little more than biblical glosses on psychological motifs. Read More

Does Justification Still Matter?

Once upon a time, the label evangelical identified those who were committed not only to historic Christianity but to the doctrine of justification by grace alone through faith alone because of Christ alone. Read More

Scott Redd in the news

NCTC Director and Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

Photo
Outgoing U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales (R) is escorted by U.S. Navy (Ret.) Vice Admiral Scott Redd. Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), while touring the Operations Center at the NCTC in McLean, Virginia, September 10, 2007. REUTERS/Molly Riley (UNITED STATES)
Photo
Outgoing Attorney Gen. Alberto Gonzales, left, listens as National Counterterrorism Center Director John Scott Redd speaks at the center in McLean, Va., Monday, Sept. 10, 2007, following Gonzales tour of the facility. (AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)
Photo
Outgoing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, left, accompanied by of the National Counterterrorism Center Director John Scott Redd, gestures while speaking with the media following a tour of the center in McLean, Va.

Photo
Outgoing Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, right, walks with of the National Counterterrorism Center Director John Scott Redd during a tour of the facility in McLean, Va., Monday, Sept. 10, 2007.(AP Photo/Lawrence Jackson)

Senate hearing photos

Photo
Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell (2nd L) testifies before a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing on "Confronting the Terrorist Threat to the Homeland: Six Years after 9/11" on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 10, 2007. McConnell is joined by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff (L), Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence John Redd (2nd R) and Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Mueller. REUTERS/Jim Young (UNITED STATES)

Terror Update: Where Does the U.S. Stand?

Michael Chertoff
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff (L) arrives at a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs hearing with Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell (2nd L), Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Robert Mueller (2nd R) and Director of the National Counterterrorism Center in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence John Redd on Capitol Hill in Washington, September 10, 2007. (Jim Young/Reuters)

Officials Warn of Continuing Terrorist Threat

“We are safer than we were on Sept. 11, 2001,” John Scott Redd, a retired vice admiral who heads the National Counterterrorism Center, says in his prepared remarks to the committee. “But we are not safe. Nor are we likely to be for a generation or more.”

Admiral Redd is essentially answering a question put to the counterterrorism specialists by Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut who heads the panel: “Today we ask: Where do we stand in our ability to detect and deter the next attack that we know is being plotted, or to respond effectively and mitigate the damage to our citizens and our way of life should it succeed?”

Confronting the Terrorist Threat to the Homeland: Six Years After 9/11

Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
Date: 9/10/07
Time: 9:30 a.m. ET
Place: Dirksen Senate Office Building, Rm. 342

Webcast: Click here to view archived hearing (Real Player format)

Senator Joseph I. Lieberman [View PDF] Senator Susan M. Collins [View PDF]


The Honorable Michael Chertoff [View PDF] , Secretary of Homeland Security , U.S. Department of Homeland Security
The Honorable J. Michael McConnell [View PDF] , Director of National Intelligence
The Honorable John Scott Redd [View PDF] , Director, National Counterterrorism Center , Office of the Director of National Intelligence
The Honorable Robert S. Mueller III [View PDF] , Director , Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice




Sunday, September 09, 2007

America’s Mayor Goes to America

Rudy Giuliani has staked his campaign on the idea that he will keep America safe from terror the same way he kept New York City safe from crime — with ruthless efficiency. Is there a method to his relentlessness?

U-M's D 'looked slow'; Bellotti: 'We could have got on them worse'

photo

(KIRTHMON F. DOZIER/Detroit Free Press)

Carr, Wolverines put on brave face

Face it: Wolverines are just terrible

David Guralnick / The Detroit News

Michigan fans lament the Wolverines' second loss of the season -- and fourth in a row.

Martin remains confident in Carr's coaching ability

photo

(KIRTHMON F. DOZIER/Detroit Free Press)

Disgruntled Michigan fans display anti-Lloyd Carr signs during the loss to Oregon on Saturday. But athletic director Bill Martin gave him a vote of confidence.

Hart guarantees win over Irish; Carr: 'Nothing can keep me down'

photo

(ERIC SEALS/Detroit Free Press)

CARR WRECK: Coach should offer to resign

Maize & Boo: Michigan's nightmare worsens

photo

(ERIC SEALS/Detroit Free Press)

HEAD SCRATCHER: Coach Lloyd Carr can't believe it late in the first half after Oregon built a 32-7 lead over his formerly fifth-ranked Wolverines. Carr ended last season with two straight losses and has started this season with two more. Next: Notre Dame.

Saturday, September 08, 2007

Michigan Wolverines 2007 - Rest in Peace



Dixon and the Ducks beat Michigan 39-7, its worst loss since 1968

Michigan got embarrassed again, just in a different way.

A week after being upset by Appalachian State, the Wolverines were handed their most-lopsided loss in 39 years as Dennis Dixon and the Ducks cruised 39-7 on Saturday. Dixon accounted for 368 yards and a career-high four touchdowns.

Michigan (0-2) has opened a season with two straight losses at home for the first time since 1959 and has dropped four straight, dating to last season, for the first time in four decades.

Unlike the stunning loss to the second-tier Mountaineers, the Wolverines didn't even keep it close against Oregon. The 32-point setback was Michigan's worst since losing 50-14 at Ohio State in 1968, the season before Bo Schembechler's debut in Ann Arbor.

Michigan hasn't won a game since Schembechler died the day before the Ohio State game last year.


The numbers will be everywhere - the first two losses to start the season since 1998, four straight losses since 1967, the second-most yards surrendered in program history to the epic Northwestern shootout in 2000, the fewest points scored since a 3-9 loss to Purdue in 1996 (there are a lot, aren't there?) - and the pressure will be beyond anything the Wolverines faced, even last week.

That Michigan was a Top 5 team before the season seems absurd after two games.

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

U2 - Please acoustic (live from Elevation Miami)

'New Al Qaeda plot to blow up planes on September 11' smashed

Police have smashed a suspected al Qaeda terror cell nursing a "profound hatred of US citizens" plotting to bomb civilian and military jets.

The force of the planned explosions would have been worse than the train bombings in Madrid and the Tube and bus attacks in London on 7 July, 2005, according to German security sources. Those attacks killed 191 and 52 people respectively.

Three men aged 22, 28 and 29 have been arrested in Germany days before they planned to strike, and bomb-making equipment and explosives have been seized.

The arrests come a day after Danish police conducted raids and took eight young Muslims into custody whom they suspect of plotting a bomb attack and having links with al Qaeda. No direct link has yet been established between the two plots.

Federal prosecutor Monika Harms said the three suspects had bought 700kg (1,500lbs) of hydrogen peroxide to make massive bombs. She said: "We have prevented what we believe would have been the worst terror attacks ever on German soil".

Al Qaeda In Iraq: How to understand it. How to defeat it.

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

There's Still More Football To Play

Michigan is still great, even if it's a national punching bag right now. That offense is going to hang up huge numbers all season long to make up for the issues on defense. The Wolverines are going to beat Oregon. They’re going to beat Notre Dame. I’m not sure about the Penn State game, but they’re going to beat Northwestern, Eastern Michigan, Purdue, Illinois, Minnesota and Michigan State before playing Wisconsin. They’re going to be right in the thick of the Big Ten race all season long, and they’re going to be a serious threat to go to the BCS. Losing to Appalachian State changed nothing other than national title hopes, which were out of Michigan’s hands anyway since USC and LSU, thanks to how the system works, will play for the championship if they each go unbeaten.

So relax. In two weeks, ff your team still stinks, or if your team is still blowing the doors off everyone, then it’s time to react. Let’s wait and see how the teams that got crushed play this week to see if week one’s big win might not have been that big a deal. Don’t judge everyone quite yet.

Michigan takes historic tumble in the polls

The final fallout from a disastrous opening weekend for Michigan came Tuesday, when the Wolverines dropped all the way out of The Associated Press Top 25, an unprecedented fall from No. 5 to unranked.

Since the AP poll expanded to 25 teams in 1989, no team has taken a bigger tumble in one week.

Michigan also fell from No. 5 to out of the USA Today coaches' Top 25.

However, twenty-two of the 60 head coaches that vote in the poll kept Michigan in the top 25. One voted the Wolverines as high as No. 10.

But it was not enough to keep Michigan out of the "others receiving votes" category between Clemson and Miami.

After an opening college football weekend filled with blowouts and highlighted by Appalachian State's stunning 34-32 upset of Michigan at the Big House, there was little notable movement in the Top 25 other than the Wolverines.

...

Michigan received 39 points from the media voters in the Top 25, including a 16th place vote by Wayne Phillips from The Greenville (Tenn.) Sun.

"I still think Michigan has a good football team," he said. "I think they're worthy of being ranked. They may prove me wrong."

Phillips said he gave Michigan some leeway because he's very familiar with Appalachian State, the two-time defending I-AA champions.

"They're a pretty darn good football team," he said. "If Michigan had lost to some of the other patsies some of the big teams played I could see dropping them out."

Appalachian State is not eligible for the AP Top 25, which only ranks Bowl Subdivision teams. The Wolverines host Oregon on Saturday.

Before Michigan's fall, Notre Dame held the ignominious record for largest drop in the rankings in the Top 25-era. The Fighting Irish dropped 16 spots — from No. 9 to No. 25 — after losing to Northwestern 17-15 on Sept. 3, 1995.

Texas dropped 15 spots in 1997, going from ninth to 24th after a 66-3 loss to UCLA in September 1997. Louisville also fell 15 spots — 11th to unranked — in September 2005 after losing to South Florida.

The highest ranked team to fall from the poll after one loss was No. 2 Oklahoma in 1959, when the AP was ranking the top 20 teams. Later that season Army went from No. 4 to unranked.

In 1950, Tennessee went from No. 4 to unranked in October and in 1960 Illinois fall out of the ranking from No. 4.