Sunday, October 22, 1995

Washington Post Magazine:Too Much? Too Soon?




To be 14. So much to learn. So many choices. So much to do:

Aaron Wolf, at the moment, is choosing to watch TV. He's in Silver Spring, in his house, in the den, in a recliner, with a remote in one hand and a microwave burrito in the other. On the screen, some women are rubbing their chests. "This is Shaggy. 'Boombastic,' " he says. "It's pretty good." He watches for a few seconds, grows bored, clicks the remote. On comes VH-1. "Janet Jackson. 'You Want This,' " he says. "I don't like Janet Jackson." He clicks the remote again. "Nickelodeon." Click. "The country station." Click. "Bette Midler?" Click. "O.J." Click. Jenny Jones, talking to a pregnant 15-year-old. "I like Ricki Lake." Click. Click-click-click. Back to MTV. "Jodeci," he says. " 'Every freek'n night, every freek'n day, I wanna freek you, every freek'n way' . . . I hate this group." Click. "I'm screwed. Nothing's on."

Now he's at a video arcade, playing a fighting game called Mortal Kombat. He mashes a row of buttons, and his fighter kicks the other fighter in the head. He mashes the buttons some more, and his fighter keeps kicking as blood drops fly across the screen. "Finish him!" a computer-generated voice commands. He mashes the buttons again, and his fighter reaches into the mouth of the other fighter, roots around and pulls out his skeleton. "Fatality," announces the voice. So much for that.

Now he's back at his house, playing the home version of Mortal Kombat against his older brother, Nick. He has stalked Nick's character. He has punched him repeatedly. "Finish him!" says the voice. Time for the uppercut. Nick's character goes flying upward, off the screen, and comes raining back down in pieces. There's an arm. There's the torso. "There's the head," Nick says, watching it bounce.

Now he's signed on to America Online, in an area called Rabbit Jack's Casino, playing poker against a few other people, strangers all, who are also signed on. Here come the cards. He wins. Here comes a message from one of the other players. "Eat this," it says.

Now he's turning on the stereo and putting on one of his favorite CDs:

"I knew the girl was ready . . .

"She started getting sweaty . . .

"But all was in my head was kill that bitch like Freddy . . ."

Now he's talking about movies, about how much he likes them and about some of the things he's seen in them, such as shootings: "I've seen someone up close get shot in the head. I've seen just about any kind. I haven't seen anybody get shot in the eye. I've seen somebody do this" -- he puts a finger in his mouth and pretends to pull a trigger -- "and you see blood come out the back of the head. I've seen people shot in the leg, shot in the back."

And stabbings: "In the back. In the stomach. Slice their neck. Scar their face. I don't think I've seen eyes gouged out. I've seen after, but I didn't see the process. I saw someone slit their wrists for a suicide."

And sex: "Oh I've seen a lot of that. I've seen people where, like, they choke the other person in the process . . . I've seen someone stabbed, I guess, in the process . . . I've seen just about everything. I haven't seen men and men. I have seen women and women. I've seen a threesome."

And now he's back in the recliner, back in front of the TV, this time with a bowl of Cheerios and a slice of chocolate cake, talking about the common theme of his days.

"I like violence," he says.

He elaborates:

"I like seeing violence."

And elaborates further:

"I just really like watching violence."

He has a good face. He has a nice smile. He has a direct, unapologetic gaze.

TO BE 14 IS TO BE a work in progress, and that's what Aaron Wolf is.

Physically, he's big for his age: 5-foot-10, 145 pounds, size 11 shoe. Mentally, he's smarter than average: He spent seventh and eighth grades in a magnet school for students gifted in math and science. But otherwise, to see Aaron in a mall, or in an arcade, or in the recliner, or anywhere, is to see someone who might be any 14-year-old, especially one whose back yard is a neat suburban patch of lawn. He wears the same cap, baggy Levis, XXL Stussy shirt, and high-top Nikes as every other 14-year-old boy. He swims. He bowls. He's interested in girls. He likes baseball. He gets good grades. In every way, he seems to be doing well enough as he comes of age, except he is doing so now, in 1995, a time when every aspect of popular culture seems awash in violence and explicitness, and there's increasing debate over what the effects of this will ultimately be. Are we becoming more violent? Debased? Desensitized? Is American society in the midst of a moral decline? These are the questions of the moment, and there's Aaron, at the very age most vulnerable to the sway of popular culture, in the middle of it all.

To those for whom popular culture has become a moral crusade, he's a victim.

To those who see it as a business worth billions of dollars, he's the marketplace.

To his parents, he's a child to be proud of, doing fine so far.

All, in their own way, have an interest in Aaron. They want to know what he's thinking, what he's doing, what he's feeling, how he's developing, because, in theory, to know Aaron is to perhaps know a thing or two about where we're headed.

As for Aaron himself, he, at the moment, is headed no farther than up the stairs of a medium-sized house in a middle-class neighborhood. "Here's my room," he says at the top, motioning to the left. His brother's room is to the right. His parents' room is downstairs. They rarely venture upstairs, rarely go into either boy's room. Nick's door is open, Aaron's is shut. He twists the knob, and the door opens a few inches. He pushes against it, and it opens a few inches more. He pushes against it with one of his feet, and it opens far enough for him to squeeze in, and then, whatever is on the far side of the door begins to push it closed.

It turns out to be piles of clothes. And sheets. And swim flippers, a chair on its side, soda cans, dishes and plastic bags of trash, so much stuff that it is impossible to tell whether the floor is carpeted or bare wood. Aaron makes his way to his bed, sits on a corner, looks down at his feet, and is surprised to see that on the top of his right foot is a lengthening trickle of blood. It must have happened when he was pushing against the door. Or when he was plowing his way through one of the piles, maybe he hit a soda can. Whatever, he ignores it and points out a few things: the desk at the far end, the stereo, the TV, the VCR, the Nintendo system. The Nintendo is one of four game systems in the house. The TV is hooked up to cable, including all the premium movie channels. The stereo system has a five-disc CD player. Now he shows off his CDs, which are mostly rap, with an emphasis on gangsta rap, one of which he decides to play. He gets up, scuffs his way through the clothing, turns on the stereo, comes back, sits down, listens to the music, nods his head, taps his foot, looks down, and sees that somewhere during the journey between the bed and the stereo, the trickle of blood has been wiped away. He keeps the sound at a moderate level. Not that his parents would say anything if it was loud. They mostly leave him alone, trusting him to do the right thing. There are no limits on what he can listen to, no limits on what he can watch. If it's midnight, and he can't sleep, and he wants to watch "Leprechaun 2," the movie that showed him what it's like when someone's puckered lips touch the whirring metal blades of a fan, he can do that. If he wants to go to an R-rated movie, he can do that, too: In his wallet is a card, approved by his parents and issued by one of the movie theater chains, that says he can go to any R-rated movie he wants, with or without an adult.

None of this is because Aaron's parents are uninvolved in his life, but precisely the opposite. When he was little, they took him to museums and read to him at night; when he was 9, they told him he couldn't have a Nintendo system until he was 10; when he was 12, they told him he couldn't see horror movies until he was 13. Once he hit 13, however, they decided he was mature enough to make his own decisions about these kinds of things, and that limiting his choices from then on wouldn't be guidance, but censorship.

"I don't want to cut anything off from him," says his mother, Lynne, 45, who works out of the house doing transcription for medical practices so she can be home in the mornings, and afternoons, and whenever else might be necessary, for her sons. "I want him to experience everything he can experience."

"I don't believe people should be sheltered, because if you're always sheltered as you're learning your thought processes, how do you deal with the world?" says his father, Bryan, 49, a manager with a defense contractor. "He knows: 'If I can conceive of the extremes, then I know there's a place in the middle where there's balance.' "

Or so is the hope. They don't know if he knows this for sure, can't know. It's too early. At this point, all they can be sure of is that the world Aaron is coming of age in is far different than the one they inhabited when they were 14.

For Bryan, that was in 1960, when he was in New York City, attending a yeshiva. There was no TV in his life, no music, and only an occasional movie. Days were devoted to prayer and study, and nights were spent taking long walks around Queens with an older rabbinical student who would argue with Bryan about philosophy, about the existence of God, about evolution, about fairness. For him, 14 was an essential year in his intellectual development, and much of the reason why, years later, when he was living in Germany and visited the remains of some of the concentration camps, he decided that any limitation of information is censorship, and that he would never inflict that on his children.

Lynne, meanwhile, turned 14 in 1964, when she was living in California. "You want to know what I was trying to do? I was trying to survive," she says. "Two years before, my sister had died, and what was left of my family after that was disintegrating. My parents were alcoholics, and this made it worse, and it was the defining event of my adolescence: Any semblance of family life we'd had fell apart." For her, 14 was a tailspin, which is much of the reason why, earlier this year, when she saw Bob Dole on CNN and, as she describes it, "they were interviewing him about the morality of youth today, and he was saying with all the videos and movies coming at kids there's moral confusion, I was saying, 'Oh, please.' The confusion comes from kids not having someone to come home to, or give them a bowl of cereal in the morning, or hug them when they've had a bad day."

Out of their own experiences, then, both Bryan and Lynne decided that Aaron, at 14, was mature enough, and felt loved enough, to be able to make his own decisions, even if that means listening again and again to the song that is now playing in his room, which includes the line, "I dug between the chair, and pulled out the machete, she screamed, I sliced her up until her guts were like spaghetti."

"I don't mind him listening. I do mind the lyrics," Bryan says.

"We both mind the lyrics, and he knows it," Lynne says.

"But how will he know what something is unless he listens to it?" Bryan says.

Of the two, Lynne is slightly less certain about all of this than Bryan. "Ninety percent of me is comfortable with this, but 10 percent of me has Jeffrey Dahmer lurking in the background," she says one day. She is joking, of course, but unlike Bryan, who is confident that Aaron, at 14, has enough solid values in place to carry him past such lyrics, Lynne talks to him constantly, trying to add some perspective.

"When we listen to the car radio," she says, "and they say, 'We're gonna do it, do it, do it, all night long,' or, 'We're gonna yo yo yo with your ho ho ho,' I say, 'What are they doing, Aaron?' He says, 'They're having sex, Mom.' And I say, 'Are they using protection?' He says, 'I don't know.' I say, 'Why do they have to do it, do it, do it? Why can't they do it and have a conversation?' I try to say things to make him think about all of this. Most of the time, what he says is, 'Mom, I don't even listen to the lyrics.' But the thing is, if I can hear them, how can't he?"

So it is that on the way to the video store one day, when the song on the radio says, "I want to be your sexual chocolate," she says to Aaron, " 'I want to be your sexual chocolate?' What does that mean?" And when another song says, "Yeah, baby, I like it raw," she says, "What does he like raw? Is it life? Is it sex? What is he saying?"

Aaron, in turn, shrugs. Maybe he's listening, maybe he isn't. Into the store they go, and he begins searching while Lynne, standing away from him, thinking about what she would have been doing on an idle day when she was his age, says, "The only thing we had in my little town was, do you remember Andrew Carnegie? Who would go around and build libraries in little towns where they didn't have one? Well, we had a Carnegie library. And a big afternoon was you'd ride your bike to the country store and buy a Coca-Cola and a Twinkie, and you'd ride to the creek with your Twinkie and Coke and two library books and spend the afternoon. And now, to stand here and look at all the choices Aaron has, it's kind of overwhelming."

Patiently, she waits. He keeps looking. He goes through the movie titles. He moves on to the video game section. It takes him 15 minutes, but at last he makes a selection.

"Jeopardy," he says, handing it to her.

"Jeopardy?" she says.

"Yeah," he says.

"Fine with me," she says, surprised.

They get in the car. He turns on the radio. She'd rather hear oldies, or opera, or Bruce Springsteen, but, as always, she lets him put on what he wants.

"Who's this?"

"This," he says, "is Ol' Dirty Bastard."

HE PLAYS JEOPARDY ONCE. He plays it twice. He gets bored. So long, Jeopardy. Now he puts on Mortal Kombat, which he never gets tired of. Once, he played for four hours without stopping.

"All right, we're starting our game," he says, explaining what he's doing as he presses various buttons on his controller. First he has to decide which of a dozen characters he wants to be. "I'm choosing Jax because he's fun to use, and I like one of his moves where he pounds you to bits," he says. Now he begins stalking, kicking, and punching the opposing fighter. "Right now I'm staying my space . . . Now I'm jumping at him . . . Now I'm trying to trap him in the corner . . . Now I got him. No I don't. Yeah I do. There!" The other character crumples. He wins. But he's disappointed. "I was going to do a pit move. I was going to knock him into the acid. But I was unsuccessful."

So he tries again, again, again.

He pulls his opponent's arms out of their sockets.

He becomes a female who kisses her opponent, stands back and watches him explode.

He becomes metal blades that chop off the opponent's head.

He freezes his opponent, hits him and turns him into flying shards.

He does an uppercut that causes his opponent to fall off a bridge and keep falling until he hits concrete and his head splits open.

He becomes Jax again.

"Finish him!" comes the command.

This time he does it right. It isn't the pit move, it's one he likes even better. He stretches Jax's arms out to the side and brings them together as if clanging cymbals, but there are no cymbals here, just two fists and an opponent's head that is in the way. Boom! The head is crushed, and Aaron laughs. "It's the best one."

All of these moves are secret moves, not part of the general instructions, not known to the casual player. Rather, Aaron has learned them from scanning the Internet, and, in some cases, from reading a glossy monthly magazine Nick gets called GamePro, which shows how to perform moves such as the "head inflation," the "skull rip" and the "death scream." And this is where the marketplace implications of Aaron's choices begin to emerge.

The cost of GamePro: $ 19.97 a year.

The cost of the home version of Mortal Kombat, which he and Nick got as soon as it came out: $ 60.

The cost of Mortal Kombat's successor, Mortal Kombat II, which he and Nick also got as soon as it came out: $ 60 again.

The cost at the arcade, where they go at least once a week to play the latest version of the game, Mortal Kombat 3: 50 cents to play until you lose, which can add up quickly, even for a good player. Aaron imagines he easily spends more than $ 100 a year at the arcade; three years after the first version of the game was released, that's how much pull it continues to have. He plays it constantly, and he, of course, is just one player in a universe that Roger Sharpe, director of licensing for Midway Manufacturing Co. in Chicago, where Mortal Kombat was invented, says includes 60,000 arcade machines, more than 10 million copies of the home versions, and 60 licensed spinoff products from posters, to calendars, to lunch boxes, to clothing, to a live-action road show, to a feature-length movie that, a week after its premiere, has people at Midway feeling a little giddy. "How are we doing?" Sharpe says into his phone, getting the daily update. "Outstanding . . . I love it!" He hangs up. "God, we're over $ 30 million already. I love it."

When Mortal Kombat was first introduced, Sharpe says, the thinking was that it would be popular, but no one in their wildest dreams expected it would gross $ 800 million its first year in the arcades. Likewise, the hope was that the movie also would do well, but $ 30 million? In one week? The No. 1 movie in the country? "Pac-Man was a phenomenon, the best-selling game of all time," he says, searching for a comparison. "Pac-Man and Ms. Pac-Man together sold over 200,000 [arcade] units, plus apparel, and cereal, and 'Pac-Man Fever' -- it was a hit single -- but has there been anything of this enormity? Across the board? Like this? No."

"Thirty-two million," says John Tobias, the co-creator of Mortal Kombat, the next day, as he sits in an office crowded with a drawing table, a computer and piles of the latest Mortal Kombat products, including Halloween costumes. Tobias, a 26-year-old artist, first came up with the idea for Mortal Kombat in 1991, and four years later, he seems as amazed by what has happened as anyone else.

The point, he says, was merely to design a new game. He was finishing up a game called Total Carnage, which was a sequel to a game called Smash TV. At the same time, Ed Boon, a programmer, was finishing a game called High Impact Football. Both wanted to do a martial arts game. Neither had anything specific in mind at first, but gradually the game developed through a series of decisions: that it should be a side-view game rather than revolving 3-D, that the characters should be a certain size on the screen, that the impact of a kick should make a certain sound, that a foot or a fist should move at a particular speed, that it should be based on digitized images of actual actors rather than cartoonish figures, that there should be flying drops of blood. The goal was realism, Tobias says, and early on they knew they were onto something. "I believe it was when we put the uppercut in, and the other character went flying in the air. It really felt like he had hit someone," he says. "There was a generic sound in there, and it all seemed good."

But not great. Something, they decided, was missing at the end of the game. "There was this awkward moment where the other character is standing around dazed, and then you hit him again, and that was it. It seemed anticlimactic. We wanted every ending to seem like, boom. If you win, you should get a reward for winning," he says, which is how they came up with the idea of finishing moves, or fatalities, something that is common in games now, but, at that point, hadn't been done.

By the time they first tested the game at a Chicago arcade in early 1992, they had come up with only one. They were sure no player would discover it. It was too well hidden. It required pushing the buttons on the control panel in too complicated a sequence for someone to stumble upon. There were no hints on the Internet or in the gaming magazines, and the machine they wheeled into the arcade on a Friday night came with no instructions to help a player figure anything out about the game, much less a fatality. The machine didn't even have any kind of design on it or decals, just a hand-lettered sign. But that was enough to get kids lined up to play, and before the weekend was out they had of course found the fatality, and the oohs and aahs were so wonderful, Tobias says, that he and Boon went to work Monday knowing they had to think of more.

"What if he ripped his heart out and held it up? Wouldn't that be cool?" he says of the creative process that followed that first weekend. "What if you pull off his head and his spine is still attached? . . . It was almost like Ed and I were trying to reduce ourselves to 15-year-old kids. That's what you have to do in this industry, think like a 15-year-old or 16-year-old game player."

In all, they thought of seven fatalities for the first version, 24 for the second, and 28 for the third, rejecting only one idea along the way that had one of the characters getting sliced in half by a sword, causing his guts to spill out. "We decided we didn't want to see anyone's guts," Tobias says about that. "If it makes us queasy, there's no way we want to push it. We already thought we were pushing it. Even we have our limits."

In spite of that, the game was, to put it mildly, controversial from the start. It was called disgusting. It was called damaging to children's psyches. It was accused by one U.S. senator, Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), of adding to America's "epidemic of real violence." It was the subject of a congressional hearing, which led to the wide use of a ratings system for home versions of video games, which led to Tobias and Boon adding something called friendship moves to the second version, moves in which, as Tobias describes them, instead of decapitating an opponent, "somebody would plant a flower, somebody would bake a cake, really stupid things." On and on this went, and meanwhile, between the arcade versions and home versions, Mortal Kombat was generating hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue and becoming the most popular game of its time. And in spite of the criticisms, the fatalities remained an essential part of the game because, as Tobias says of the players, "They're adamant about having violent, gory fatalities. That's what they want."

Including Aaron. One other thing Tobias says about the game is, "I think the violence almost, after a while, becomes transparent. I mean, the fact that there's gobs of blood flowing out of somebody when you punch him, I don't think that that's the attraction any longer." Rather, he says, it's the fun of the game, the competition.

But to Aaron, it's the blood as much as anything else. Competition is Jeopardy, he says on the day that he has put Jeopardy aside after two plays, while in Mortal Kombat, which he has now been playing for almost an hour, "You can do a finish move, and it's like, yeah! Got you! And your opponent, like, dies."

So strong is the appeal of this that when the movie comes to Silver Spring, it plays in two theaters simultaneously. Aaron, of course, is there. He goes with the rest of his family, sitting, as they always do at movies, in the second row. It's where they sat for "Pulp Fiction," in which a guy in a car gets shot in the head and bits of his brain go flying about; it's where they sat for "Apollo 13," of which Aaron said afterward: "They went into space, they had their troubles, they came back, they made it. My parents thought it was nonstop action, but I must have missed it"; and it's where they sit now for two hours, watching one fight after another, until the last bad guy is impaled on a spike, and the credits fade, and the lights come up, and Lynne stands and says, "That's the second worst movie I've seen this summer."

"That was about exactly what I expected," says Bryan.

"I loved it," says Nick.

"I liked it," says Aaron. "But I think they should have made it rated R so they could show more stuff."

"So they could show more stuff?" says Bryan.

"Like they could show their fatalities. Like when Johnny Cage fought Scorpion? You know how he just blew up? He could have, like, uppercutted his head off or something like that."

"Or tore him in half," says Nick.

"Yeah," says Aaron. "And what they should have done at the end is, you know when Liu Kang pushed him? They should have done this fatality where he did a double kick and then uppercutted him. A cartwheel, and then, bam."

"So," says Bryan, "you liked it better than 'Apollo 13'?"

"Oh yeah," says Aaron.

"Why?" says Bryan.

"I like action," says Aaron. "I mean, what was 'Apollo 13'?"

"Drama?" says Nick.

"No," says Aaron. "More like . . ."

"History?" says Nick.

"No," says Aaron.

"Suspense?" says Nick.

"No," says Aaron. "It's, um . . ."

"Boring?" says Lynne.

"Yeah. Boring."

"So it doesn't have to make a lot of sense to you?" she says. "It doesn't have to challenge your mind at all?"

"I like watching them fight."

BACK HOME. AARON WATCHES ESPN, reads the Sports section, starts flipping through his CDs. "I can remember back when I was 6 or 7," he says. "I liked 'Born in the USA' by Bruce Springsteen; and I liked the Beatles, like 'Twist and Shout'; I liked Yes back then; I think I liked Paula Abdul for a little bit, maybe when I was 9 or 10 or 8; I remember Def Leppard back when I was 8 or 9, 'Pour Some Sugar on Me,' that was heavy metal; and then I heard this song by Young MC called 'Bust a Move,' and then I started getting into rap, I started getting into Public Enemy, and LL Cool J, and then, from three years ago, it's been whatever's up. Whatever's playing."

What's playing now is the Geto Boys, a CD he got a few years ago when he first started listening to rap almost exclusively, one that contains a song called "Assassins," which is the song about slicing a woman "until her guts were like spaghetti." And goes on to say:

"A maniac, I stabbed the girl in the tits.

"And to stop her nerves from jumping, I just cut her to bits.

"And I'm an assassin . . ."

The song is one of Aaron's favorites. "I like the way they rap," he says of the song's appeal. "I really don't care about what they say. That doesn't bother me. I don't pay attention." Maybe so, but he does know most of the words, including the line about the girl being stabbed in her breasts, which is so graphic that it can't help but create an image in his mind. "I see [someone being] stabbed," he says of what that image is. Anyone in particular? "I don't have a face." Does he see breasts? "Yeah." Does he see a knife? "I see a machete." Does he see anything else? Blood? The machete actually embedded? The machete being drawn out? "I don't know," he says. "I don't pay attention." It's just an image, he says, no big deal, no dire consequences, one that quickly fades as the song moves on:

"My father was a priest, cold-blooded, he's dead, hypocrite, I caught him basing, so I shot him in the head . . ."

Like a dozen other CDs Aaron owns, this one has a label on the cover that says, "Parental Advisory -- Explicit Lyrics." It's there because of a long-ago battle, brought on in 1985 by Tipper Gore and several other wives of politicians, who were so bothered by certain lyrics that they formed the Parents' Music Resource Center and got record companies to start putting warning labels on music most likely to be considered offensive. Aaron, who was 4 years old when this began, knows little about it. He knows about the stickers but ignores them. He's heard of Al Gore, but he hasn't heard of Tipper. Neither has he heard of the PMRC and its current head, Barbara Wyatt. Nor has he heard of William Bennett, former secretary of education and current head of Empower America, or C. Delores Tucker, head of the National Political Congress of Black Women, whom Wyatt got to join forces earlier this year for an attack on Time Warner over some of the music it had been distributing. And neither has he heard of David Chamberlin, who, when all of this was beginning in the mid-1980s, was a 14-year-old himself, living in Ohio and listening to Van Halen, and 10 years later found himself sitting across from Wyatt at the Stage Deli in Manhattan, scribbling some notes on a napkin. He wrote down: Nine Inch Nails. He wrote down: Red Hot Chili Peppers. He wrote down: Slayer. He also wrote down a few song titles and lyrics and gave the napkin to Wyatt, who hurried from the deli to a Time Warner stockholders meeting, where she passed the information to Tucker and Bennett to use in their attack.

"Every day of my life, I listen to music," Aaron says. "Everywhere I go, there's music" -- and so it is for David Chamberlin. "I love music," he says. "You'll never come into my office and not hear music unless the CD runs out and I'm on the phone." But while Aaron spends his days consuming it, Chamberlin, who moved to Washington last October and first met Wyatt in April, has begun helping in the crusade against what he considers its most extreme forms, largely because of the role music played in his life when he was growing up.

This goes back to Ohio, when he was living in the suburbs, in a house with a pool, and 2 1/2 acres of woods, and his own room with posters on the walls of astronauts and baseball players, and parents whose marriage was falling slowly apart. When they were home, he says, they were often fighting, and when they weren't home there was a lingering tension, and either way he spent a lot of time in his room, door shut, volume up, listening to music: Van Halen, Bon Jovi, the Scorpions, Hanoi Rocks. All of it helped, he says, especially, for a brief time, Twisted Sister, whose song "We're Not Going to Take It" filled him with a kind of defiant hope that he would one day get away. Which is what happened. He went off to college, to a small, Christian, liberal arts school in Indiana, where he arrived hoping not only for an education, but for escape. Except his parents' marriage was growing worse; and his high school girlfriend was calling him every week, every day, every hour, wanting to know what was happening to their relationship; and school was hard; and living alone was difficult; and the music he was listening to at that point wasn't so much about defiance as alienation; and one night he went for a walk, in the dark, with a knife, wondering whether to commit suicide, fairly certain he would. That night, he says, was the beginning of a realization that came to him more fully years later, that some of the music he was listening to, while certainly not the cause of his despair, helped to exaggerate it. The music, he says, "gave me clarity because there was a lot of stuff I was feeling that I couldn't put into words, emotions of hurt, of anger, of anxiety, and these guys captured that. After a while, though, it increased the anxiety. It kept me from getting past the issues and dealing with them . . . You just wallow in it. 'Wow! Other people feel this way, too.' "

So it was that years later, after surviving that night, receiving his degree, moving to Washington, and getting a job at the Family Research Council, a conservative research and lobbying organization, he found himself in a meeting one day with Barbara Wyatt, telling her that he had been keeping files on certain musical trends, and lyrics, and groups for years, from those he liked, such as U2 ("my favorite group in the whole wide world"), to those he found disturbing, such as Nine Inch Nails. She, at that point, was casting about for ways to raise the profile of PMRC, and though she had been in touch with Bennett and Tucker, she didn't know enough about music specifically to be of maximum help. And here, suddenly, was someone who not only knew that there was a group called Nine Inch Nails, but that their music was industrial alternative, and that their latest album was recorded in the very house where the Manson killings occurred, and that one of the songs, "Closer," included the lyrics, "You let me violate you, desecrate you, complicate you, penetrate you. I want to [expletive] you like an animal."

That was in mid-April. A month later, the two of them were on their way to New York for the assault on the Time Warner stockholders' meeting, and, since then, Chamberlin says, he has been volunteering, on average, a dozen hours a week, helping the PMRC with its latest idea, a 900 number for parents to call to get information about what their children are listening to. The number, which has room for 85 short reviews and went into operation over the summer, is only one part of Wyatt's plans for the PMRC. She hopes to establish some kind of youth advisory board that would meet regularly and discuss the implications of music. She hopes to start some kind of annual awards show that would recognize music for being positive rather than destructive. "The repetition of certain types of music -- I'm not talking about all music, I'm talking about the ones that preach violence, that preach illicit sex, that preach violence against women, that preach rape, that are filled with profanities -- these, at the least, compel you to think about these things," she says. And so the 900 number, which is, in essence, Chamberlin.

He is the one who chooses what music to highlight by scanning the Billboard Top 100, reading music magazines, buying CDs, and playing them often enough in his office, his car, his home, to chronicle their profanities and themes. He is the one who writes the reviews, and his is the voice on the recordings. The point isn't to tell a parent what to do -- "that's between the parent and child," he says -- but simply to inform anyone interested enough to pay $ 1.75 a minute what a particular album contains. From his own experiences, he says, he knows the power of music and the vulnerability of adolescence, which is why, with the best of intentions, he picks up the phone in his office one day, dials a special access number, and dictates his latest review, written over his lunch break: "The Red Hot Chili Peppers, a Warner Brother Records artist, has released 'One Hot Minute.' The album uses numerous obscenities and vulgar language; extols such behaviors as theft, homosexuality, substance abuse and casual sex . . ."

Of which Aaron says, upon hearing this review, "Pretty stupid."

He is at home. He is in the living room. He has recently been listening to Tupac Shakur, who, Chamberlin points out in one of his reviews, "is currently in prison for sexually assaulting a fan," and now, with the music off, he listens to more of what Chamberlin has had to say.

"Salt-N-Pepa, a London Records artist, has recorded 'Very Necessary,' " begins the review of that album.

"What's wrong with Salt-N-Pepa?" Aaron interrupts. "I mean, my parents like Salt-N-Pepa."

"The female rappers glorify promiscuity and prostitution and advocate violence," the review continues. "Their song 'Shoop' includes these lines: 'Felt it in my hips so I dip back, through my bag of tricks, then I flipped for the tip made me wanna do tricks. Gonna lick him like a lollipop . . ."

"Should be licked," Aaron says, finishing the line from memory. "What's wrong with that?"

He listens to another:

"Dr. Dre, an Interscope Records artist, has recorded his latest album, 'The Chronic.' "

"Yeah, I got that," Aaron says.

"The album encourages drug abuse, views women as strictly sex objects and has obscenities throughout . . ."

"I don't think he views women as sex objects," Aaron says. "Maybe he does. Yeah, probably he does."

Another:

"Snoop Doggy Dogg, a Death Row/Interscope Records artist, has recorded 'Doggystyle.' Violent themes predominate, as well as highly sexual content advocating oral and group sex. The album portrays women as sex objects and advocates drug abuse and murder . . ."

"Yep, got that," Aaron says. "Everybody has that. And everything they say about it is probably true."

Another:

"The Stone Temple Pilots, an Atlantic Records Artist, released their latest album, entitled 'Purple' " . . .

"What's wrong with 'Purple?' I want to hear this."

"The album is bleak . . ."

"Bleak?"

". . . and portrays life as basically meaningless . . ."

"What?"

". . . and slams self-control while promoting indulgence."

"It's music," Aaron says. "Please! So dumb."

WHEN AARON WAS 3 YEARS OLD, he saw his brother Nick step on a nail. It was a long nail, sticking up through a piece of discarded wood in the back yard, and Nick, who was 5 at the time, came down on it so hard that it went through his sandal and deep into his foot. He screamed. He fell. Lynne came running, and so did Bryan, while Aaron, standing at a distance, watched.

Eleven years later, this remains the worst thing Aaron has seen in his life. He has seen fistfights at school. He has gone by accidents on the Beltway. He has seen his father emerge from heart bypass surgery. But seeing Nick like that is the only time he has seen somebody truly in pain, which is why Lynne, who finds herself thinking about this one day, says that after 14 charmed years, Aaron has no firsthand understanding that all human beings, including himself, are ultimately mortal. "There's been nothing in his life to give him that sense," she says one morning, sitting on the beach at Ocean City, where the family has come for an end-of-the-summer vacation before Aaron begins high school. As she talks, she is watching a Coast Guard helicopter sweeping low above the water. The word is that a child is out there somewhere, missing since the night before, presumably drowned. Back and forth the helicopter goes, and Lynne can't help but scan the water, too.

Aaron, meanwhile, has no interest in this whatsoever. What is there to see, really, except a helicopter, a lot of water and now, cruising past, some kind of search boat? In his life at the moment, he has a more immediate concern, namely that there's a new video game being released this day called Killer Instinct. He and Nick have been saving for it. He wants it, wants it now, wants that game cartridge locked into the Nintendo system he has brought from home along with a TV, and that is what's on his mind as he begins calling store after store in Ocean City, trying to track down a copy. Finally: "Do you have Killer Instinct? You do? How much is it? What's the price? Do you have any copies left?" He hangs up. He's found it -- except that it's at a store in Salisbury, a 40-minute drive away, and when Bryan says he's not up for driving that far, Lynne becomes his only hope.

"Move your toesies," she says, coming in from the beach and looking for room on the sofa, where he's stretched out. She pats his foot, which has a slight mark on it from a day a couple of years ago when he was running around the neighborhood, and a kid with a pellet gun took aim at him, and the pellet hit his foot. It stung a little and made a dent, but there was no blood, and the sting went away, and that's been his only experience with a gun. Now he moves his foot. She sits. He asks if she'll take him to Salisbury. She says she can't because she's supposed to go shopping with a friend. He doesn't know what to do.

He has got to have that game.

"Are there any buses?"

"No, babe."

"It's only a half-hour."

"Honey, I don't want to go."

"It might be fun."

"What's fun about going to Salisbury? Salisbury's a place you drive through, not to."

"So, like, there's no buses that go there?"

"Honey . . ."

He thinks. His best friend, Morgan, who has come along on the vacation, thinks as well. "Give it up," he suggests.

"Thank you, Morgan," Lynne says, and then to Aaron she says, "Enjoy vacation. Live it up before you go back to school. Go to the arcade. Be a kid. Go to the beach. Put on your suit. Just promise me you won't go beyond the second wave."

Which, of course, he does. He goes so far out that, at one point, the lifeguard has to whistle him and Morgan in, and they come in laughing, and then they go play some games, and then they go bowling, and then they go to a fast-food restaurant where Morgan tells about how, at high school orientation, the principal was saying they can't bring anything to school that even resembles a weapon, that they can't have beepers, that they can't even wear caps, and then it is 9 p.m. and there is nothing really to do. So they go back to the condo, and as soon as Aaron opens the door, Nick comes hurrying down the hall.

"Can I see you a minute, Aaron?" he says, trying to sound calm.

Aaron follows him back to their bedroom. The TV is on. The Nintendo is hooked up. And there, on the screen, is Killer Instinct. "Dad went and got it," Nick says, and Aaron can hardly believe it.

"Is it sweet?" he says. "Is it sweet? Is it sweet?"

"It's pretty good," Nick says, laughing, and they immediately begin playing against each other.

Aaron's character hits Nick's character, and out oozes a green liquid.

Nick's hits Aaron's, and out flies blood.

Aaron's lands an uppercut, and Nick's character goes flying. "Ho!" Aaron says. "That was kind of nice."

On this goes, past 10, by which time Nick has mastered a combination move of 10 punches in a row; and 10:30, when Bryan pokes his head in the door and says, "So what is this thing I did?"; and 11, by which time Aaron has learned several finishing moves, such as the Sword Stab and the Falling Car. There's also the Needle Stab, the Acid Puddle, the Neck Breaker, the Lava Pool, the Skeleton Grab and the Heart Attack -- every conceivable fatality in the world, it seems, except for one involving a drowning, perhaps of a child, particularly at Ocean City, which is the subject of conversation in the living room.

Now the word is that the child was a boy, 10 years old, out for a swim when he got caught up in the current. His father and his uncle did their best to save him but couldn't hold on. And the boy was swept away.

"I let go of my son," Bryan says. "I can't imagine coming home and saying, 'I let go of my son.' "

The door to the balcony is open. The sound of the waves is coming into the room. The search, so far, has found nothing. The body is still out there.

Once, years ago, during another trip to Ocean City, Bryan was on the boardwalk with Nick when he lost him. He looked everywhere he could think of, growing more and more frantic, and then, not knowing what else to do, knowing only that he didn't want to go to Lynne and tell her he had lost their son, he went to the police station. And there was Nick, waiting. "That was the worst," he says.

No, Lynne says, the worst was last summer, when Aaron didn't come home from school on the bus, and in the course of several hours she went from thinking he was late, to hurt, to abducted, to dead, until he walked in and said he had been at the arcade.

There are so many things that can go wrong. Lynne especially knows this. Sometimes, to her, it seems a wonder they have made it this far. But they have, and now they sit together in the living room, listening to the ocean, until she goes into the bedroom to read, and Bryan, after trying to sleep, goes onto the balcony. It must be past 1 a.m. He watches some police officers roust a man and a woman entangled in the sand. He watches for shooting stars. He watches the dark water. Sometime after 2, the wind dies down and the humidity comes up, and at 3, he looks in on Aaron and Nick.

They're still awake. Still playing. It's been six hours straight.

"Go to bed," Bryan says, and they do, and now it is the next day, and Aaron and Nick are at it again, and Bryan and Lynne are on their way out to lunch.

They're in Lynne's Lincoln, what she calls her menopausal car. Bryan's driving. He loves to drive. Sometimes, at home, he'll drive up and down Rock Creek Parkway for no reason other than to drive, and look around, and remind himself how beautiful things can be. Lynne, meanwhile, is fiddling with the radio, and comes upon an old Righteous Brothers song. She turns up the volume and settles back. "Now this was music," she says, getting a little dreamy. "God, my kid's not going to have memories like this. Twenty years from now, he's going to get nostalgic over . . ."

But what?

"Oldies rap?" says Bryan.

"I stabbed her in the tits?" says Lynne.

And they laugh, because they believe in their hearts that everything is going to work out fine.

MAYBE IT WILL, TOO. "Aaron Wolf. Your son. Very intelligent little kid. Very smart. Going to be a lawyer when I grow up, and maybe even a baseball player," Aaron said in a message he left on his father's voice mail a few years ago, a message so sweet and spoken so happily, in such a sing-songy voice, that Bryan has preserved it. Maybe that will happen.

Or maybe, in eight years, he'll get a job designing video game fatalities.

Or maybe, in 10 years, he'll join the PMRC.

Who can know? It's too soon. He's only 14. There's so much ahead. "I'm not, like, worrying about that now," he says one day on the subject of how he'd like his life to work out. Instead, he has more immediate concerns on his mind because it is a Friday afternoon, and he's home from school, and he's got an English assignment that involves reading a book. And on this subject, he says, "I don't really like books . . . I don't like sitting down and reading. I'd much rather watch TV . . . If it's boring, I can switch to another channel. But in a book, I have to keep reading until I find the next interesting part. It takes too long."

It was different, of course, for his parents. When Lynne was 14 and her sister had died and her own life was falling apart, she came across The Grapes of Wrath. "That's what I got from books, realizing there were other people out there whose lives weren't so good, that they had to struggle, and they survived," she says. Bryan, meanwhile, was reading Crime and Punishment, which led to The Brothers Karamazov, which led to Sinclair Lewis and Arrowsmith, a book whose main character, an idealistic young doctor, filled him with such hopefulness that it pushed him toward becoming a scientist, and then a teacher in D.C., and fostered in him an optimism that has continued to this day.

And now they have Aaron:

"I can't even get him to sit down with me and WATCH The Grapes of Wrath," Lynne says one day.

"He's never going to read The Red Badge of Courage," says Bryan.

"Let's put it that way," says Lynne.

Neither thinks this will necessarily make the world a worse place -- "It'll be a different place, that's all," Bryan says -- but just the same, every Christmas, they get Aaron a book. Just in case. One year it was The Fire Next Time by James Baldwin. "I don't think he read it," Lynne says. Another year, it was The Dreamtime, a book of Australian aboriginal myths. Another year it was The Man Who Knew Infinity, a biography of the Indian mathematical genius Ramanujan. Another year it was Flatland by Edwin A. Abbott, a book written in 1884 that uses math, satire and spirituality to tell the story of a man living in a two-dimensional world. "Bryan gave him this and said, 'Aaron, this affected me. Give it a try,' " Lynne says. And did he read it? "Are you kidding?" She is in his room, looking through his books, all stacked on a bottom shelf, all coated with dust. But there they are for him, if and when he's ready.

And now comes a new book: To Kill a Mockingbird. That's his assignment.

"When he was nearly thirteen, my brother Jem got his arm badly broken at the elbow," is how it begins and goes on from there to explore how cruel and hateful people can be. There's an attempted lynching. There's a killing. There's an attempt to murder some children. There's plenty of violence, in other words, but unlike in a video game or most of the music Aaron listens to, it is violence that occurs within a larger context of decency and love, and that is the book he has brought home to read. He's had it now for a week. "I'm on Page 2," he says. "Some guy hurt his arm playing football or something." He needs to finish it. He will.

But now, on a Friday afternoon, the weekend ahead, there are so many other choices, all infinitely more appealing. Maybe they do involve violence, he says, but he isn't worried about the effects. It's not like he doesn't know the difference between reality and fantasy; it's not like he can't handle it; it's not like he's going to kill anyone, or hurt someone, or become so numbed that he can't tell the difference between right and wrong. "Maybe like a flower," he says, thinking about this. "If you keep seeing it, do you still keep seeing it? Or is it just there? You don't care. That doesn't mean you're desensitized. You're used to it."

And besides, he goes on, "If I hadn't seen anything violent, I probably wouldn't be who I am, and I probably wouldn't have much of a life."

He elaborates:

"If I hadn't seen all this, I'd be different."

And elaborates further:

"I wouldn't even have an outside life.

"I'd be scared to be with anyone else.

"I wouldn't be able to relate to anybody else."

And further:

"Because they've all seen it."

So: What will it be this afternoon? Music? TV? Video games?

He makes a decision. He turns on the computer, and on comes a game given to him by another student in school a few days before, called Druglord.

He starts with $ 500 cash. The computer asks him to choose what he wants to buy: "cocaine, crack, heroin, acid, crystal, grass, speed, ludes."

He makes his choice, and now the computer shows him some prices.

He decides to spend all $ 500, and now he has to decide where he wants to sell the drugs: Chicago, Detroit, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, New York, San Diego or Washington.

He chooses San Diego, hits the button and is told that he's just made a $ 500 profit.

"Pretty nice," he says.

Now he has enough money to buy and sell some heroin.

And with the profit from that he's able to buy and sell some speed.

And now he's up to $ 3,500 when a character named Juan appears, selling some AK-47s -- except the price is $ 5,000, firm.

"Ooh, I can't believe it. Those are the nicest guns. I could kill some cops."

And wouldn't you know it, here come the police.

They're closing in. They're surrounding him. They're opening fire. They're blasting away, shooting and shooting until a message comes up on the screen:

"Everything has a strange misty look to it . . . you start to feel heat under your feet . . . you see flames licking all around . . . I guess this is the end."

And there it is.

Aaron Wolf, 14, is dead.

But not for long.

"Would you like to play again?" the game asks.

He presses 'n'. For no.

There are too many other things to do.


GRAPHIC: John Tobias, the co-creator of Mortal Kombat, has watched the much-criticized game generate hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue from youthful customers. "They're adamant about having violent, gory fatalities," he says. "That's what they want." Aaron Wolf, with cap, plays Mortal Kombat II with his older brother, Nick. "If I hadn't seen anything violent, I probably wouldn't be who I am, and I probably wouldn't have much of a life," Aaron says. "I wouldn't be able to relate to anybody else." David Chamberlin, a rock music lover whose "favorite group in the whole wide world" is U2, has helped establish a 900 number that parents can call to get information about the violent, sexually explicit song lyrics their children are listening to.

Thursday, September 14, 1995

No Sweat

EDDIE DEAN'S “DIRTY WAR” (8/25) is a perfect example of shoddy journalism. Dean's thesis is that “pop music is designed to divide generations” and that people who do not get this are absurd. While this is interesting and controversial, nothing in his article supports it. He merely states his thesis as self-evident, and then turns more acerbic, tearing into Barbara Wyatt and the Parents' Music Resource Center (PMRC) to expose their supposed absurdity.

While the piece is sophomoric and arrogant, it makes a few concessions. For instance, Dean reports that the leadership of the PMRC is capable, and that the official goals of the PMRC are moderate, perhaps even balanced. However, instead of examining this critically, Dean jumps to name-calling. A state Supreme Court judge, an Oscar-winning songwriter, a minister, and a president of a suicide rescue association are derided as a “motley crew.” David Chamberlin is described as “knowing a lot about Nirvana,” as if this is the beginning and end of Chamberlin's learning and worth. Wyatt, the most unjustly treated, is caricatured as a spinster piano teacher with an archaic view of music and culture. It is only in passing that we learn Wyatt's achievements are monumental, that her views are disciplined, and that her manners are both gracious and refined. Why then the insults if these people do not deserve them?

Probably Dean insults his subjects because they were multidimensional, intelligent, and beyond the grasp of a single take. This was supposed to be an easy piece, he thought. So instead of facing reality and the work, he took the refuge of an incompetent—he insulted everyone else. Washington City Paper should not let lazy thinking masquerade as cynicism.

Falls Church, Va

Friday, August 25, 1995

Dirty War: The Parents' Music Resource Center is back. And this time, it ain't settling for stickers.

When Sen. Robert Dole and William Bennett recently railed against the “dirty” music sold by Time Warner as a toxic influence on America's young people, many dismissed their attacks as the toothless barks of conservative bloodhounds hitting the campaign trail a year early.

That was before Time Warner decided to abandon its $100-million stake in Interscope—the label hosting the immensely popular work of Nine Inch Nails, Snoop Doggy Dogg, and Tupac Shakur. Time Warner's sudden buckling was startling from a company that endured similar protests for years.

It was the first surrender in a cultural war that has been simmering for years. To begin with, Time Warner found itself imaged as the evil empire by anti-gangsta-rap activist C. Delores Tucker. The director of the National Political Congress for Black Women, Tucker drew a target on the company because she felt it was enriching itself by marketing hate and oppression of black women and, in her words, “pimping pornography on our black youth.”

But the staunch Democrat's crusade was in vain—nothing more than a lone woman shouting outside the corridors of power or, as in 1993, in front of a D.C. record store—until she joined forces with Bennett, former Bush-era drug czar and head of the conservative think tank, Empower America.

In May, Tucker and Bennett stormed the annual Time Warner stockholders' meeting in New York and blasted executives for peddling violent and sexually explicit music to teens. In June, Dole piled on, hurling more accusations at Time Warner in a speech in Century City, Calif. In the speech, the presidential candidate upped the ante, blaming the nation's “moral degradation” not only on rap and rock music, but on the entire entertainment industry. By August, Time Warner couldn't stand the heat; the company that once defended Ice-T's song “Cop Killer” from outraged police groups now scrambled to bow to the whims of a few high-powered whiners.

The rapid chain of events was hastened by the imminent release of an album by Interscope act Dogg Pound, another sure controversy that Time Warner wants no part of. But the actual scenario that brought the corporate giant to its knees wasn't some fluke.

After all, what in the hell is ol' Bob Dole, whose interest in pop music probably begins and ends with the “Ballad of the Green Berets,” doing ranting about evil tunes for teens? And in a foul-mouthed oratory spiked with Nine Inch Nails lyrics, no less? And how about that right-and-left-wing tag team of Bennett and Tucker—Mr. Book-of-Virtues hisself and the church lady of the mean streets. How did this incredibly odd couple hook up? And what are they doing terrorizing boardrooms and scolding CEOs like they were a bunch of naughty schoolboys?

“It shows what some pressure can do,” smiles Barbara Wyatt, who masterminded the brilliant, if unlikely, scheme to embarrass the captains of industry into compliance.

A grizzled veteran in the war against explicit music, Wyatt heads the Parents' Music Resource Center (PMRC), a nonprofit group that has decried lyrics in rock and rap since 1985. After forcing the record industry to implement the notorious parental advisory sticker, the Arlington, Va.-based PMRC slipped below the rim of public consciousness. Many thought that the PMRC would go the way of disco after founder Tipper Gore's resignation in 1992.

But under Wyatt, who took over last December, a smarter, savvier PMRC has re-emerged, subtly altering its approach and enhancing its reach. By staying in the background and working the levers of power, Wyatt has shown the deft touch of a studio engineer, backward-masking subliminal messages of censorship on an uplifting soundtrack about saving kids.

It was Wyatt who introduced and recruited “old friends” Bennett and Tucker for the initial assault on Time Warner. “I put Bill and Delores together because I felt it would be a very viable combination,” she says bluntly. “Republican/Democrat, conservative/liberal, male/female, white/black. Perfect.”

It was Wyatt who provided the ammunition—some of the wording, in fact—for the public bashing of Time Warner. Both Dole and Bennett (whose wife Elayne has been a PMRC board member for years) readily admitted they hadn't listened to the music they denounced so viciously. The bazooka for Dole's particularly effective salvo in the cultural war was loaded with material—including verses from “Entrails Ripped From a Virgin's Cunt” by Cannibal Corpse—courtesy of the sleek '90s-model PMRC.

The PMRC isn't just for pissed-off parents anymore. Some PMRC workers hail from the ranks of the young and baseball-capped whose very souls the group wants to salvage. For starters, there's David Chamberlin, the 23-year-old U2 fan who is the deadpan voice of the PMRC's new 900-line phone service, warning callers about everything from Aerosmith's “Eastern mysticism” to Snoop's glorification of group and oral sex. And there are office volunteers such as Wyatt's 25-year-old son Freddy, a self-described “Generation Xer” who culls Vibe and Spin to keep his mom informed about rap and rock culture.

The days of Tipper Gore are over. Gone is the all-female garden club of political spouses that Frank Zappa ridiculed as the “Washington wives.” The PMRC's incoming board boasts a broad roster of men and women who live far outside the Beltway—from Utah minister Donald Sills to Al Kasha, the L.A. composer who penned the score for The Poseidon Adventure.

Most important, the PMRC's message, once the scorn of many besides Zappa, has gained currency in a way that the group's founders never could have dreamed. Opportunists from both ends of the political spectrum now mimic the PMRC's battle cry: that violent, sexually explicit music is inflicting permanent damage on the youth of America. And it should be stopped—not labeled, debated, or criticized, but rubbed out.

The quiet momentum of the PMRC hasn't gone unnoticed by its historical opponents. Critics are repeating the same warning they made back in 1985: The only thing that needs to be stopped, they argue, is the PMRC, which—despite its claim to be an educational clearing house with a mission “to inform parents”—is really a thinly disguised censorship group.

“The PMRC has always claimed they just wanted warning stickers, but they don't just want that,” says Phyllis Pollack of Def Press, a California-based PR firm. “They want to wash everybody's mouth out with soap.The PMRC is an anti-free-speech group. This isn't about music—this is about free speech.”

“The PMRC is being totally disingenuous when they say they're not for censorship,” says James D'Entremont of the Boston Coalition for Freedom of Expression. “They know full well that [lawmakers] can use the arbitrary and not especially reliable parental advisory labels as some kind of magic key to what is supposed to be censored and what isn't, which is insane.”

Several state legislatures, including Pennsylvania's, are weighing bills this year that would make it illegal for minors to buy albums saddled with Parental Advisory labels. Though the PMRC claims it has never advocated censorship, Wyatt sees no problem in preventing teens from getting their hands on explicit rock and rap albums.

“We don't sell alcohol, tobacco, or Playboy, or any of those to young people,” she says. “It seems to me that if [music] is advocating what those things promote, then why are we letting our children have it? These songs encourage violence, they encourage killing, they encourage total disrespect for authority, and that is against the law—-now, disrespect for authority isn't against the law—-but the others are against the law. And yet we're handing them something that says "do it.' ”

The PMRC is back, and—as Time Warner execs have already learned the hard way—its members want stickers applied over the mouths of artists they can't abide.

The voice of Barbara Wyatt is curt and quickly impatient. Wyatt is a former music teacher, which explains why she often sounds like a piano instructor who's endured the off-key blunders of too many clumsy fingers in her time.

“I'm a fairly reasonable soul,” she says. “But I do not like this violent music. This gangsta rap is so full of hate. I think it's detrimental to society, especially in the inner city, because they live in a violent enough world.”

If Wyatt's view seems hopelessly naive—that rappers should simply concentrate on being positive role models—her grasp of the historical role of music reveals a profound bias that no amount of spin control can mask. Try as she might, Wyatt can't understand why things can't be like the old days—say, somewhere down South in the mid-19th century: “Think of the slaves,” she says wistfully. “What wonderful music we have from those people....Those were bad times and yet their music was filled with hope. It was a very gentle, lilting music, not this angry music we have today.”

On a stifling summer afternoon, the petite, proper Wyatt sits at a table in the cool confines of the PMRC office, which is tucked behind hedges on the ground floor of the Virginian, a '50s-style brick apartment building that towers above Route 50 in Arlington.

Breathing the bland quiet of a parish rectory, the office seems an unlikely spot from which to wage battle against the mighty music industry. It's disappointing to find there's no sullen crew hunched over CD players, transcribing the lyrics to the latest gangsta rap horror—only a volunteer or two answering the occasional phone call. A small yellow radio—the sort that always seems to be playing “Theme From a Summer Place”—is perched on the window sill. More decoration than research tool, it is turned off. A silent TV and a VCR gather dust as well.

This tiny, cramped office has served as the PMRC's headquarters for years; in fact, there are remnants of the old regime everywhere: One rack holds frayed LPs by Mötley Crüe, Twisted Sister, and other forgotten '80s hair-metal acts. These tattered trophies from the PMRC's first crusade, once the subjects of so much controversy, now couldn't fetch chump change at a yard sale. Nearby sit stacks of the PMRC's 1991 video Rising to the Challenge, which sells for $23.95 a copy; it profiles many of the bands now consigned to the nearby used-record bin.

Like relics from another era (but actually only a few years ago), the badly dated vinyl and video demonstrate what the PMRC is up against: the warp-speed pace of change in pop music, a phenomenon the group views as an ever-steepening spiral of moral erosion. This frenetic arc of pop culture ensures that what's shocking in the summer triggers nothing but a yawn by late fall.

Against the wall are more relics of the old PMRC's Inquisition, including shelves of books that resemble the portable library of a high-school counselor specializing in at-risk teens: sociology tomes, juvenile delinquency tracts, treatises on satanic cults. And, of course, the basic texts of the anti-“porn rock” movement of a decade ago: All Ears: How to Choose and Use Recorded Music For Children, Rock Bottom, Learn To Discern. There is also a dog-eared volume titled Why Knock Rock?, a notorious right-wing, rock-hating manual that features instructional photos on how to organize a record burning.

Conspicuously absent is Tipper Gore's 1987 best-seller, Raising PG-Rated Kids in an X-Rated Society, which featured—among many titillating passages—a quote from W.A.S.P. singer Blackie Lawless: “I like to drink blood out of a skull and torture females on stage.”

According to Wyatt, someone borrowed the only office copy of Gore's book (still in print as a paperback) and never bothered to return it. Wyatt hasn't much to say about her famous predecessor: “She hasn't been involved or active with us for years.” In fact, Wyatt hopes to distance the PMRC from its controversial years under Gore: “I don't want to be perceived as we have been in the past, as only a negative force,” she says. “The media wanted to portray us as the bad people.”

Nobody really suggested that they were bad people, but it's no secret that the old PMRCers were perceived by many as a gaggle of prudish, wealthy housewives who had little understanding of the music culture they attacked. A board member since 1987, Wyatt was one of those women. Now that she has leapt into the spotlight, she's sensitive to the fact that she's several decades older—a grandmother, to boot—than the original Washington wives. Indeed, Wyatt gets downright defensive when asked about her age: “Whether I'm 21 or 97, I don't think it has any bearing,” she says. “It's totally irrelevant to the issue.”

Age may not matter to Wyatt, but it may soon prove a crucial matter for teens in the states poised to ban labeled music for minors. The PMRC's calculated focus on young people may put some very popular albums out of reach of the young crowd that desires it.

Beyond her breathtakingly archaic view of black people, Wyatt's very concept of music seems to stem from those pre-Presley days before teens really had their own youth culture. Back in the '40s when Wyatt was growing up, teens often enjoyed the same music as their parents—if for no other reason than there was nothing for them to embrace as their own. Wyatt was no exception.

Raised in small-town south Jersey, Wyatt played organ at recitals and churches; the power of classical music still stirs her, decades later. “You get very emotionally charged,” she recalls. “When I sat down to play a Chopin. Oh! I was into that thing.”

Wyatt was a teen-ager during the golden age of Bing Crosby and all those romantic moon-june-and-spoon love songs, and she didn't shy away from the dance floor. “We had Teen Canteen every Monday night where we went and danced for three hours. "Kiss me once and kiss me twice and kiss me again,' and all those songs from the movies,” she recalls. She later majored in music (“piano, voice, and organ”) and taught for years.

Since the '80s, though, Wyatt has forsaken the world of Chopin and Show Boat recitals to toil as a professional cause-monger. During the Reagan administration, she helped launch the Missing and Exploited Children Program; she is also a former director of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare's Youth 2000 initiatives: “I've worked on many youth issues,” she says, rattling off a list: “Youth suicide, teen pregnancy, drug and alcohol abuse, accidental death—so I know this area.”

Wyatt has also logged her share of charity work, especially the patriotic sort. During the Persian Gulf War, she and her husband, a retired Navy officer, sold bracelets emblazoned with “Operation Desert Shield—A Call to Freedom.” The copper bracelets sold well at $9.95 each, especially after Barbara Bush flashed hers on a TV talk show; the proceeds went to a nonprofit group, Voices for Freedom, which paid for U.S. soldiers to make free phone calls home.

Wyatt says her record as an administrator qualifies her to head the rejiggered PMRC: “My main strength has always been implementing national programs and making things happen,” she says. “Either behind the scenes, like putting together Bill and Delores, or being out there in front, whichever I have to do.”

It's obvious that Wyatt and her minions have been emboldened by hearing their message on the lips of political leaders. There is an air of possibility in the office, a belief that goes beyond influencing public debate to controlling the messages young people hear in pop culture. The current political climate, with its broad backlash against racy pop culture, has created a much more receptive environment. Even Bill “MTV Boxers” Clinton has taken up the lance. Wyatt says the PMRC's offensive against offensiveness has just begun. “We had been really just reactive,” she says. “I felt like if I took over, we were going to be proactive. And I was willing to do that.”

Critics of the PMRC are keeping a close watch on the rejuvenated group. “We're not at all surprised by the return of the PMRC,” says John Woods of the Ohio-based group, Rock Out Censorship (ROC). “We always knew it was just a matter of time before they jumped back in front of the media cameras again.”

Wyatt has done just that. After accomplishing a great deal working in the background, Wyatt has stepped up her media presence. This afternoon, she has just returned from a taping for VH-1, and is busy planning a flight to L.A. for an interview with a German TV station; she spent the summer on radio talk shows, sparring with rappers and promoting the rejuvenated PMRC. “I debated a rapper the other day on the television, and he was saying [his music] was just describing the times, and I'm saying, "You could be such a role model—you hold the key to making some of the changes,' ” Wyatt says. “Obviously they're not going to make all the changes, but they really could have a profound influence on the young.”

Wyatt admits that she knows virtually nothing about the current music scene except that much of it is what she calls “verbal pornography.” But she argues that her ignorance merely puts her in the same situation as the parents whom the PMRC serves. Besides, Wyatt has her 25-year-old son Freddy: “Freddy's been a tremendous help to me,” she says. “He knows the music—he'll go to concerts and report back to me.”

Indeed, Freddy often volunteers at the PMRC office, fielding phone calls and mailing out pamphlets and videos. A former sales rep for a clothing company, he used to do promotions for D.C. nightclubs; he now hopes to find financial backing for a worldwide snowboarding exhibition. Freddy admits he digs a lot of the music damned by the PMRC, but then, he's an adult and has come to believe there are some lyrics that are just too explicit for teen-agers.

He should know: When he was a teen, Freddy hated his mom's group, especially at moments like when the PMRC came up during a classroom discussion of censorship.

“The early group was bunch of gray-haired old ladies sitting around going, "Oh my gosh! I can't believe they used the word “fuck” in a song,' ” he says. “Now [the PMRC] is a little more open-minded in realizing that's real life. The only thing we're trying to do is protect the kids. We're trying to give the parents a helping hand, saying, "Hey, this is what your son is listening to, and, if he's got this album, it's a possibility, if he plays it many, many, many, many, many times, then it might have something to do with his head.' ”

As for his mom, Freddy thinks she's doing a great job, even if he's always having to explain all that gangsta-rap lingo to her: “I just try to bring the realization of the street to her that Tipper and them didn't [have],” he says. “I pull things out of Vibe that their own people are talking about. I'm not going in looking at some Surgeon General's report. You gotta go to the roots.”

Though the debate about gangsta rap has ignited the most controversy and Op-Ed articles, the PMRC is concerned about all sorts of audio mayhem flooding the marketplace. Grown-ups, children, and everybody in between are buying millions of CDs that have rape, gunplay, and alienation as their most persistent motifs. But that hasn't stopped the PMRC from focusing on profoundly obscure groups. The group hammers on no-sellers like Carcass with the same ferocity that it shows Tupac and Snoop.

Wyatt holds up a fax that features the lyrics and song titles from Carcass and Cannibal Corpse: In her neat cursive handwriting, she has jotted on the missive, “Morgue Rock—New low level,” as well as a list of recent Carcass song titles: “Genital Grinder,” “Vomited Anal Tract,” “Maggot Colony,” “Excreted Alive,” “Exhumed to Consume.”

“You feel that you've traveled in the gutter seeing this,” says a disgusted Wyatt. “I can't imagine what kind of person would even think of this stuff, let alone perform it. They have to be deranged in some way.”

Cannibal Corpse's “Entrails Ripped From a Virgin's Cunt” is a far cry from the pop tune that first spurred Tipper Gore to start the PMRC back in 1985: Prince's “Darling Nikki,” which now seems almost as harmless as one of the show tunes that serenaded the Teen Canteens Wyatt attended in the '40s.

It's telling that Tipper's initial foray into musical supervision was strictly between parent and child, which is where most PMRC opponents think music decisions should stay: “I purchased Prince's best-selling album Purple Rain for my 11-year-old daughter,” wrote Gore in Raising PG Kids In an X-Rated Society. “I had seen Prince on the cover of magazines, and I knew that he was the biggest pop idol in years. My daughter wanted his album because she had heard the single "Let's Go Crazy' on the radio. But when we brought the album home, put it on the stereo, and listened to it together, we heard the words to another song, "Darling Nikki': "I knew a girl named Nikki/Guess you could say she was a sex fiend/I met her in a hotel lobby/Masturbating with a magazine.' I couldn't believe my ears! The vulgar lyrics embarrassed both of us. At first, I was stunned—then I got mad! Millions of Americans were buying Purple Rain with no idea what to expect.”

Sometime after Tipper and daughter got an earful of “Darling Nikki,” Gore and three other wives of powerful politicians founded the PMRC to protest the availability of explicit music.

At first, the group mostly floundered and flailed away at the pop charts in a rather comical display of parental guidance gone simply silly. A 1985 list of songs deemed “offensive” by the PMRC seems laughably innocent a decade later—for example, the Captain and Tennille's “Do That To Me One More Time” and Bruce Springsteen's “I'm on Fire.” Later that year, Gore testified at the notorious “Porn Rock” hearings before a Senate committee and was generally ridiculed in the media.

Eventually, the so-called Washington wives managed to wipe the smirks off the faces of the industry and plaster them over with parental warning labels.

Their victory may have had something to do with who they were married to, but industry and cultural trends didn't hurt their cause. At the same time that most of the country was taking a rightward turn, rap music became an increasingly powerful megaphone for an explicit, often profane denunciation of mainstream cultural values. Parents who thought they had safely insulated their brood by fleeing to the suburbs would walk into their child's room and find the walls plastered with the images of menacing gangsters promising vengeance on their white oppressors. So, while the industry stood steadfast, millions of parents didn't worry much about the assault on the free speech of artists preaching a gospel of urban Darwinism.

By 1990, the well-connected PMRC had convinced major record companies—members of the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)—to voluntarily put “Parental Advisory—Explicit Lyrics” warnings on albums with violent or sexually explicit material.

The PMRC's most lasting legacy, the labels derided by critics as “Tipper Stickers,” have become almost passé—something barely even noticed by most record buyers. (Zappa's Jazz From Hell holds the honor of being the only instrumental album to earn a label—apparently for the profane “hell” in the title.) Though it remains uncertain how they actually affect sales, the Tipper Stickers' familiar presence certainly hasn't hurt the careers of multiplatinum rappers like Dr. Dre, Coolio, and Snoop Doggy Dogg. Three of the acts on this summer's Lollapalooza tour—Hole, Cypress Hill, and Beck—have albums boasting the parental advisory labels.

But the new PMRC views the Tipper Stickers as a big failure. According to Wyatt, major labels aren't labeling enough of their dirty music, and, of course, most independent labels—home to underground bands such as Cannibal Corpse—have never bothered with the stickers at all. (Some indies still regard Tipper Stickers as badges of honor and use them, or parodies of them, even though they aren't legally bound.)

“[Gore] says that the PMRC achieved its goal, but the labeling hasn't achieved its goal in my book—that parents know what's out there and that there is a vehicle...they can rely on,” says Wyatt defiantly. “At the present time, [labeling] is not a reliable method of determining what some parents might feel is not appropriate.”

The voluntary nature of the labeling is just one of the shortcomings of the present process, says Wyatt: “Only very few companies put the labels on; that's one of the problems. Number two, there's a standard label but there's no standardized method of what should be labeled, a system that says "if they have this word in it, then it must have a label.' And even if there is a label on [a recording], any child can buy it, and the forbidden fruit is often the most appealing fruit.”

If Wyatt believes the parental advisory warnings haven't gone far enough, critics contend the warnings planted the seed for the crop of current legislation in six states—Pennsylvania, New Mexico, Louisiana, New York, Washington, and South Carolina— that would outlaw stickered albums for minors.

All of this hubbub has echoes in rock's 1950s beginnings, and the racial overtones haven't changed that much. Back then, even white-bread, barely R&B acts like Bill Haley were often banned and decried as “jungle music” corrupting white teens (who had finally gotten sick of Pat Boone's grinning swill). Pollack of Def Press points out that most of the acts presently under fire are black rap artists. In fact, she calls Dole's denouncement of the Geto Boys and other groups a politically motivated lynching.

Pop music is designed to divide generations. If the artists of one generation are failing to offend the previous generation, they aren't doing their job right. But that generational dynamic, which has been part of the rock business from Presley to Kurt Cobain, is under attack. The PMRC wants to make the teen beat off-limits to teens—for their own good, of course.

Opponents contend that the stickers have stoked would-be censors.

“[The] stickers have been used by people who would criminalize music,” says Paul Russinoff of the RIAA. “Young people have got enough to worry about without facing a criminal record for buying a CD.”

Russinoff has spent several years lobbying against the various music-banning legislation, which includes three consecutive bills in Louisiana that each time have been stopped only by a governor's veto. Russinoff says the RIAA is presently examining several proposals for alternative warning labels.

“They've had the warning stickers for a long time,” says Def Press' Pollack. “If that's all the PMRC really wanted, they'd have disbanded several years ago.”

Woods of Rock Out Censorship has been fighting the PMRC and their stickers for years.

Back in the early '90s, Woods led a Halloween protest outside the PMRC office; he now travels to rock concerts around the country armed with a petition that calls for the immediate removal of the hated Tipper Stickers. So far, he has gathered more than 50,000 signatures to send to legislators: “The mistakes that were made in 1985 through 1990 must not be made again,” Woods announces in a recent handout emblazoned with the headline “PMRC LAUNCHES NEW OFFENSIVE AGAINST ROCK AND RAP.” “We must get more musicians and fans involved in the struggle to keep free expression truly free.”

“We knew the PMRC would be back,” says Woods. “Are they dangerous? You bet. Are we going to fight them? You bet.”

Dialing 1-900-288-PMRC might not provide the uplifting experience many parents are expecting when they pick up the phone.

“ "Rape me, rape me, my friend,' ” says an emotionless male voice. “ "Rape me again. Hate me. Do it and do it again.' These are lyrics from Nirvana's In Utero. The album condones rape, suicide, drug use, and uses obscenities.”

Most rock fans recognize those verses, but the recorded message isn't for them. It's one of many such messages for parents who've called the new PMRC information help line.

PMRC volunteer David Chamberlin, the voice behind the message, isn't some rock music-hating parent. The 23-year-old is the brains and conscience of the new PMRC.

Chamberlin is a devout fan of Tom Petty, and he knows a lot about Nirvana. He has a thick file of articles and interviews on the band. He admits that he's taken the lyrics completely out of context; he is well aware that Cobain may in fact be denouncing rape —not only as an act of violence, but as a metaphor for any abuse of power. But Chamberlin's not interested in agonizing over quibbles like the intent of the artist; he wants to protect impressionable children.

“When 13-year-old kids listen to Nirvana's "Rape Me,' they're not thinking about Bosnian Muslims and all the different things in the record industry and how [Cobain] is forced to write certain songs,” says Chamberlin. “They hear what's there, and unfortunately, that's a pretty blatant message.”

Nirvana is just one of three dozen rock and rap acts currently residing in the PMRC spin bin. Chamberlin delivers parents from the task of sneaking into their kids' rooms and cuing up Kurt and the boys. He serves as translator, arbiter, tastemaker and town crier, alerting listeners of the dangers of the “relentlessly morose” music of Pearl Jam and Green Day's championing of “anti-social behavior.” Not to mention the “casual sex and obscene language” of Liz Phair, the Offspring's “negative outlook on life,” Slayer's “anti-Christian blood lust,” and the “hopelessness and despair” of Soundgarden.

Chamberlin wrote the synopses and chose the lyrics for the 900 line, which will eventually feature more than 80 popular recording artists (see sidebar).

The roster isn't some blacklist advocating censorship, says Chamberlin, but simply a hot line for concerned parents, similar to the explanatory listings (noting nudity, lewd language, innuendo, etc.) that are tacked at the bottom of movie reviews in publications like the Washington Post.

Chamberlin recalls that he thought the PMRC was “pretty stupid” when he first heard about the group back in the mid-'80s. After all, he says, he was only about 13 years old then.

An employee of the D.C.-based Family Research Council, Chamberlin works pro bono for the PMRC; he doesn't even get free CDs, but that's not his angle. In his work for the PMRC, he's found a calling of sorts, and one that's he's proud of: “I don't think I'm doing anything that's anti-music—I love great music,” he says. “I'm not out carrying a sign and saying, "No, you shouldn't be listening to this.' What I'm doing is helping inform people.”

Like Freddy Wyatt, Chamberlin acts as the PMRC's liaison to youth culture: He listens to rock music all day at the office, reads piles of hip magazines (“I heard the Stone Temple Pilots were breaking up,” he mentions in passing), and considers himself a “selective” rock fan.

What he can't abide is obscenity, even in some of his favorite music. For example, he really digs the sound of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, but he has no toleration for their “graphic sexual depictions, vulgar language, and view of women strictly as sex objects.”

He considers music and lyrics completely separate entities. “I don't see beats and stuff like that as moral issues,” he says. “I'll be the first one to stand up and say I love the Chili Peppers' sound or the Nine Inch Nails' sound. Do I approve of their lyrics? No.”

Chamberlin tries to live his personal life by strict moral standards, at least regarding sex: He and his girlfriend have decided to remain chaste until they get married (see “Just Don't Do It,” 7/28 ). That moralistic code might explain why he doesn't want to hear songs about sex.

As for his music, he puts even his pet songs to the same test: He may soon have to add his “all-time favorite band,” U2, to the 900 line. The band's not exactly satanic, but with a cig-smoking Bono now dressing as Mephistopheles onstage, the Irish rockers have sure come a long way since “Pride (In the Name of Love).” Chamberlin worries the group's single from the Batman Forever soundtrack, “Hold Me, Thrill Me, Kiss Me, Kill Me” could give kids the wrong ideas about romance. He says he's still brooding about whether it's offensive or not.

Before he makes that decision, there's a slew of bands more deserving of a spot on the PMRC hit list. Usually, he says, it's fairly obvious what music acts belong there. His short list of who's next: Blues Traveler and the Black Crowes (pro-marijuana); Primus, Foo Fighters, even old fogey Neil Young (vulgarities).

But he draws the line at Hootie & the Blowfish: “Hootie's not going on there,” he vows. “I don't think anybody can find anything objectionable about Hootie.”

You know, she entertained the Grateful Dead at the White House,” whispers a PMRC volunteer of Tipper Gore, who's not a particularly popular figure around the office these days.

When Gore is mentioned at all, the group's founder is viewed as a sort of traitor, an opportunist who bailed out to pander to the rock 'n' roll voters who put Bill Clinton and Al Gore in office. “Just remember where their money came from,” snipes the volunteer, referring to the Hollywood dollars that fill the Democratic Party coffers every election year.

(“I resigned from the boards that I served on when Al was sworn in as Vice-President so there would be no appearance of conflicts of interest between my role on the boards and my role in the Administration,” writes Tipper Gore in a faxed statement about her decision to leave the PMRC. “The present media debate is not a battle between mutually exclusive interests, and need not appear so. It is a conversation among respected entities about how we can help children make appropriate choices....Regarding my own musical preferences—I am a fan of everything from rock and roll to jazz. In fact, Al gave me a drum set for Christmas a few years ago, which we have at the VP residence. I play occasionally and our son Albert is taking lessons.”)

Officially, of course, there's no mention of ill will; Gore remains listed on PMRC letterhead along with the other founders.

Some record-industry insiders say that once Tipper left, any pretense of the PRMC's advocating free speech disappeared as well. They have noticed the new PMRC has taken a much different stance than the group did during the Gore years, when Tipper helped lobby against some of the music-banning bills.

“Tipper would always write letters and was always supportive,” says Mickey Granberg of the National Association of Recording Merchandisers. “She was always adamant that there would be no legislation. But the [new PMRC] simply hasn't been there for us.”

Granberg's single encounter with Wyatt wasn't a pleasant one: “I spoke with her when we were in the middle of the [Louisiana] fight, and she was very vehement in terms of the music being harmful to minors,” says the veteran lobbyist.

Wyatt contends that these proposed laws—and the PMRC's policy—simply protects vulnerable kids from harmful “verbal pornography” that should be off-limits to minors, period.

Even if Wyatt doesn't know much about the actual music she hates, her approach combines a keen understanding of the dynamics of politics and popular culture. Whether she has uncovered a nerve or simply stumbled across it, she and the organization are on a roll. And she's not going to let up until the PMRC has a say in what the kid down the street is listening to in the privacy of his own bedroom.

For the PMRC, explicit music is a health issue, plain and simple: “Is it censorship that we say somebody under 18 cannot drink alcohol and buy drugs or a package of cigarettes?” Wyatt says. “These things are detrimental to the growing body and the growing mind. There are many children that can listen to this music and it may not affect them, but there are many young people out there today kind of sitting on the edge.”

Def Press' Pollack finds the attempt to equate music with toxic substances completely off-base: “We have all kinds of actual scientific proof showing what tobacco does to one's lungs, to one's cardiovascular system—this is no secret,” she says. “There is no scientific proof that what you listen to on a record album is going to cause any kind of specific behavior. If so, you better go ban all the Wagner albums right now, because that was Hitler's favorite musician.”

Whether or not the music-banning bills become laws, the new PMRC has already managed to have a lot of impact under Wyatt's leadership. Moreover, the housewife image of the old PMRC that so worries Wyatt has metamorphosed into something broader based and complicated.

The tentative list of the incoming PMRC board of directors is, if nothing else, a motley crew: L.A.-based, Oscar-winning songwriter Al Kasha, composer of the music for the Irwin Allen disaster flicks, The Towering Inferno and The Poseidon Adventure (Kasha provides a recorded lecture on the power of music on the 900 line); Donald Sills, a minister and educator from Utah; Pamela Cantor of Boston, former president of the American Association of Suicidology; and William Goodloe, former Washington state Supreme Court justice, among others.

“None of these people are what you'd call common folk,” gripes ROC's Woods, who claims this lineup wouldn't be much an improvement over the former group of wives of congressmen and Cabinet members.

The actual size and sources of the PMRC's budget remains a mystery. Wyatt refuses to comment on either topic, other than to emphasize that the group receives no government money and has no political ties.

“We do not have a fix on the reorganized PMRC yet,” admits D'Entremont of the Boston Coalition for Freedom of Expression, whose massive file on the group peters out after Gore's resignation. “They seem to be moving away from leaving themselves open to accusations that they're dominated by Washington wives, and they're trying to get a little more diversity on their board.”

When she's not jetting across the country for interviews, Wyatt still tends to the day-to-day chores at the PMRC office, which she says is deluged with calls for help and information: “I had a woman call yesterday, and she said, "I want you to know, I'm a former hippie, I'm a liberal, I do not go to church, and I am incensed over this music that was just given to my child for a birthday present,' ” says Wyatt. “There's a very broad interest out there....These are parents who do not want this sold to their children. This is across the board, it has nothing to do with whether somebody's a conservative or a liberal—they realize they do not want their children bombarded by this garbage. It's everywhere—our children are listening to it six hours a day. They get up to it, they eat to it, they put it on when they're in the car, they listen to it on the Walkman.”

She's surprised that more parents haven't freaked out enough to dial the PMRC in a panic.

“The sad part is that even today, there are still a lot of people—they must be living in a cave—there are still people who will call here and say, "We knew it was bad, but we had no idea how bad.' ”

For the former music teacher, the problem is as obvious as the relentless beat of the boomboxes and car stereos outside the PMRC office window: Music can uplift or it can infect.

“Music is a very powerful tool,” she says. “It really hits you—that's why they have background music in a movie, to put you in the mood. You don't play a lullaby if you're going to war.”

Art accompanying story in the printed newspaper is not available in this archive: Charles Steck and Shawn Belschwender.

Thursday, August 03, 1995

Just Don't Do It: A Young Couple Learns the Joys of No Sex

Sure, you've had dry spells—a few months between flings, a year after your boyfriend moved out. But believe me, you've never been in a dry spell like David Chamberlin or Anne Redd.

High-school girlfriends, college girlfriends, the combined membership of the “We Broke Down David Chamberlin Club” back home in Springfield, Ohio—they all tempted him with their soft, seductive charms. But David didn't give it up. The horny boys in high school pleaded with Anne; so did the hornier boys down at William & Mary. But she didn't lose it.

Now they've been going together more than four months, and they still haven't taken the magic tumble. They're not going to. Not now, not next week, not if they get sloppy drunk, not even if they get engaged. When the vows are sworn, when the limo driver has whisked them away from the reception, when David has carried Anne across the threshold of the honeymoon suite and laid her gently down on the conjugal bed; then, and only then, it can happen.

“If we ever get married,” says David, smiling at his sweetheart, “the thing I would cherish most—besides the fact that I was married to her—is that on our first night, I could look her square in the eye and say, "This was so important to me that I give this to you. You are the first and only one I will ever sleep with.' That, I think, is an incredible gift.”

In this new Republican universe, sex—at least the premarital variety—is taking a battering. Polls, pop sociologists, and glossy magazines assure us that abstinence is hip. Forget the hunt for the last American virgin. Today, all the cool kids aren't doing it. An organization called—perhaps optimistically—True Love Waits has collected promises of premarital chastity from hundreds of thousands of teens. The Family Research Council, a vociferous, D.C.-based conservative group, is bombarding the youth of America with a pro-abstinence ad campaign in magazines like Rolling Stone and Seventeen. “Save sex,” the ads exhort, not “safe sex.”

The Family Research Council, in fact, is where I found David and Anne. She's an editorial assistant there; he does PR. I called the group seeking a (happily) abstinent couple. David answered the phone and immediately volunteered. When Anne, he, and I sat down for lunch a few days later, I could see why he'd been so enthusiastic. Ralph Reed himself couldn't father prouder, more all-American virgins than David and Anne.

You want a red-blooded male? David, who's 23, grew up in the very middle of Middle America. He's tall, strapping, and handsome. He plays baseball. He goes to church. He likes U2, Tom Petty, and J.R.R. Tolkien. He drinks a little, smiles a lot, and says “Gosh” like he means it.

Anne is the kind of young woman who makes strong men swoon. She's petite and blond. Her eyes are big and china blue. She talks confidently and laughs easily, especially at herself. Anne, who's 24, is a Navy brat—the child of “an admiral and a homemaker”—and she attended 11 schools in 12 years. She goes to church, loves Emily Brontë and Annie Dillard, and belonged to Delta Delta Delta in college.

Their blossoming romance mixes '90s technology and '50s sensibility; Newt Gingrich would love it. For six months, Anne and David were office friends. But he couldn't resist her charms. In early spring, he asked her out, by e-mail. She dissed him, by e-mail. He e-mailed again. She accepted. Three dates followed in three nights—California Pizza Kitchen, Hard Rock Cafe, Baskin-Robbins. On the third evening, they held hands in the car. “I felt stupid because I was paying more attention to her than to driving,” says David.

Anne and David do all the usual couple-y activities: movies, walks, picnics. A few weeks ago, she visited his family in Springfield. “It went great,” David says. “My sister says I should marry her.”

They do all the usual couple-y activities—except the one you'd expect, that is. Their love affair is free of modern romance's usual inconveniences: no condom-fumbling, no morning-after panic, and, best of all, no wet spot. Isn't sublimation sublime?

“There is so much more to her than just a sexual dynamic,” David says, his voice full of sincerity. “I admire her intellectually. I know that sounds geeky and cheesy and I'm sure she will call me on it later, but I'm serious. I love the way she has a tender heart. The way she gives to people. The way she cares about me and others. There is an openness and honesty that attracts me, that keeps me interested, that makes me want to know more. She's incredible.”

“That's really, really rare,” Anne says, blushing at his compliment. “It's so nice to know that someone is interested in me and not my body. I see that as very strong and masculine of him. I admire that strength. It's a reminder to me of how strong his character is.”

Skeptics out there—particularly those who've just finished a morning quickie—are scoffing at Anne and David. Surely, they sneer, these virgins are puritanical nutballs brainwashed by fundamentalist preachers. Surely, Anne and David must be terrified of sex. Surely, the couple must believe that doing the nasty is nasty.

In fact, the opposite is true. In this unchaste world, say both, virginity makes perfect sense. Yes, they are religious and the Bible demands abstinence, but that's not the only reason they are waiting for the big bang. Their families encouraged them. They learned the dangers of sexually transmitted diseases. They heard friends talk regretfully about not waiting. “I've never heard anyone say, "I wish I'd had sex with more people.' I have heard them say, "I wish I'd had sex with less,' ” says Anne.

And most of all, they say, not having sex makes it special, makes it more than just another bodily function.

“You don't need to have sex to know how awesome it is going to be!” Anne enthuses. “I want to have something that powerful and awesome shared just between me and my husband.

“The message of abstinence is so positive.” she continues. “All it is about is appreciating someone for things other than sex. It is respecting the power and value of sex.”

(To be fair to the skeptics, Anne and David do preach some dogma. David refers to a friend who's done the deed as having “fallen.” Anne discusses premarital sex with the same kind of dismay that others reserve for something like, say, dealing crack: “I don't think it is ever to late to stop having sex,” she says earnestly. “Even if you've done it once, you can still stop. You haven't wrecked yourself.”)

It's not surprising—given that David and Anne haven't gotten any, ever—that their relationship pulsates with sexual tension. As lunch progresses, they wink and stare longingly at each other when they think I'm not looking. He gently massages her shoulders. She arches her back slightly and smiles as he touches her. Their flirting begins to worry me: How do they manage to resist each other? How does David restrain himself from ripping off his tie, unbuttoning Anne's blue suit, and, well, you know....

“Early on, I guess we had an agreement on where to draw the line, and that was that,” says Anne.

And where is the line?

“The neck,” she says.

My jaw drops. “The neck?” I ask in disbelief.

“The neck,” she repeats firmly. “We draw the line at kissing.”

“We just kiss,” David says, not a hint of frustration in his voice.

“And hug and hold hands,” Anne continues. “And we will snuggle on the couch or whatever. You don't want to make it too hard on yourself.”

“Once you get started it's hard to stop,” David says.

“And, besides, you can get really creative above the neck,” she says, slyly grinning at her boyfriend.

“Yeah, you can get really creative,” David echoes. (Abstinence is sounding more and more intriguing.)

“It's a very romantic way to date,” Anne says.

“A lot of people would probably make fun of it,” David concludes, “but I think it's the coolest thing ever.”

And with that, David and Anne rise from the table. On the restaurant's stereo, Elton John croons “Can You Feel the Love Tonight?” as the couple heads for the exit, holding hands.